this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

MorphMoe

322 readers
31 users here now

Anthropomorphized everyday objects etc. If it exists, someone has turned it into an anime-girl-or-guy.

  1. Posts must feature "morphmoe". Meaning non-sentient things turned into people.
  2. No nudity. Lewd art is fine, but mark it NSFW.
  3. If posting a more suggestive piece, or one with simply a lot of skin, consider still marking it NSFW.
  4. Include a link to the artist in post body, if you can.
  5. AI Generated content is not allowed.
  6. Positivity only. No shitting on the art, the artists, or the fans of the art/artist.
  7. Finally, all rules of the parent instance still apply, of course.

SauceNao can be used to effectively reverse search the creator of a piece, if you do not know it.

You may also leave the post body blanks or mention @[email protected], in which case the bot will attempt to find and provide the source in a comment.

Find other anime communities which may interest you: Here

Other "moe" communities:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Artist: Onion-Oni aka TenTh from Random-tan Studio
Original post: The Boring Girl on Tapas (warning: JS-heavy site)

Upscaled by waifu2x (model: upconv_7_anime_style_art_rgb). Original
Unlike photos, upscaling digital art with a well-trained algorithm will likely have little to no undesirable effect. Why? Well, the drawing originated as a series of brush strokes, fill areas, gradients etc. which could be represented in a vector format but are instead rendered on a pixel canvas. As long as no feature is smaller than 2 pixels, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem effectively says that the original vector image can therefore be reconstructed losslessly. (This is not a fully accurate explanation, in practice algorithms need more pixels to make a good guess, especially if compression artifacts are present.) Suppose I gave you a low-res image of the flag of South Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท and asked you to manually upscale it for printing. Knowing that the flag has no small features so there is no need to guess for detail (this assumption does not hold for photos), you could redraw it with vector shapes that use the same colors and recreate every stroke and arc in the image, and then render them at an arbitrarily high resolution. AI upscalers trained on drawings somewhat imitate this process - not adding detail, just trying to represent the original with more pixels so that it loooks sharp on an HD screen. However, the original images are so low-res that artifacts are basically inevitable, which is why a link to the original is provided.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Man. Remember when these were just a fun marketing gimmick?

And not... You know.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know.

I don't... Is there a disgusting story specific to the flamethrower?

Anyway, Elon Musk's enterprises were never not full of stupid ideas. He wanted to pay for his extensive tunnel network just by selling bricks from the displaced soil. Did he expect millions of them to go for hundreds of dollars like limited-edition Supreme-branded ones? Or consider why roads were ever built on the surface if tunnels were so easy and profitable?

Around this time, he also claimed that he had perfected solar roof tiles while the demo houses actually featured no functional prototypes. The few units delivered were bad at either purpose. This didn't get nearly as much backlash as it should have but hyperloop hype was still strong back then.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No. It just pre-dates the wider spread of public dissillusionment with his bullshit.