this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
499 points (91.4% liked)

People Twitter

5182 readers
1570 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 5 days ago (27 children)

Removing one billionaire will do more good for the planet than anything a regular individual can do

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (17 children)

Not really. You have to remove the companies that made them a billionaire or they'll just be replaced.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

Drug trade has shown: even if you remove the company, as long as demand is there, another supplier/company will pop up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think this is why the OP mentioned buy less stuff and travel less, these two directly reduce the demand for environmentally harmful goods and services, reducing the ecological impact of the companies which issue the shares that make the billionaires in question billionaires.

It's kinda disappointing to see a post about good actionable advice to do the best you can to reduce climate change and the first reply on Lemmy is non actionable (and more controversially; to my mind irrelevant) advice to assassinate billionaires.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

What's non actionable about it? Its just a different perspective is all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)