8
McLaren admits F1 has been in 'the era of Max Verstappen' - Motorsport Week
(www.motorsportweek.com)
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)
Formula 1
9099 readers
234 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is in*
"has been" does include it happening still, doesn’t it? just to make sure my english is correct here
I'm no native English speaker, but "has been" just sounds like it was in the past and is present no longer.
So to me that sentence just implies that the "era" is over.
from https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/verbs/have-been-vs-has-been-vs-had-been/
apparently you got a wrong definition, in fact "has been" implies that is was happening in the past and is still happening in the present.
"had been" would be the alternative that defines an activity that happened in the past, in a specific time frame, and is not happening anymore.
sorry, don't want to sound dogmatic here. i'm also no english native speaker was just curious. but i can understand that it sounds a little like it's over.