this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
142 points (99.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53948 readers
572 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I searched for ages for a replacement of something like torrentz, and the rarbg drop made me start the search again. I ended up trying the included search in qbittorrent, and I'm very happy with the results, it scans many public trackers, and I have always found what I wanted.

To be clear, qbittorrent is a desktop app for linux/windows/mac, that has a panel where you can search for torrents:

https://www.qbittorrent.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Using radarr/sonarr/jackett/transmission for a lil over a year now and forgot about searching for torrents like this already. Oh the pain.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

the hunt is half the fun for me lol also maintaining a min 2.0 ratio in private trackers is like a game

I do love jackett as a search engine tho!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Might I interest you in Prowlarr as an alternative to Jackett? It handles the entire indexer process for the other *arr apps, so you don't have to update each app independently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this. the fact that I needed to link each indexer in each ARR as well as jackett made me wonder wtf was the point of jackett at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)