this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
1063 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59234 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the AI market continues to balloon, experts are warning that its VC-driven rise is eerily similar to that of the dot com bubble.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Except I'm able to replace 2 content creator roles I'd otherwise need to fill with AI right now.

There's this weird Luddite trend going on with people right now, but it's so heavily divorced from reality that it's totally non-impactful.

AI is not a flash in the pan. It's emerging tech.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (12 children)

@SCB The Luddites were not upset about progress, they were upset that the people they had worked their whole lives for were kicking them to the street without a thought. So they destroyed the machines in protest.

It's not weird, it's not just a trend, and it's actually more in touch with the reality of employer-employee relations than the idea that these LLMs are ready for primetime.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Luddites were wrong and progress happened despite them.

I'm not really concerned about jobs disappearing. Get a different job. I'm on my 4th radically different job of my career so far. The world changes and demanding it should not because you don't want to change makes you the ideological equal of a conservative arguing about traditional family values.

Meanwhile I'll be over here using things like Synthesia instead of hiring an entry level ID.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not everyone can flex into new roles. Have some compassion for those who get left behind. The lack of compassion in your response actually causes you to look conservative.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have compassion. I think the government should invest heavily into retraining programs and moving subsidies.

I don't think we should hold all of progress back because somebody doesn't want to change careers

Edit: retraining, not restraining. That's an important typo fix lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could use this kind of argument for almost anything. For example if we stop burning coal, many coal miners will lose their jobs. That doesn't mean that we should keep burning coal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Freesoftwareenjoyer interesting you mention stopping burning coal. Because mining and burning coal is bad for the environment.

Guess what else is bad for the environment? Huge datacenters supporting AI. They go through electricity and water and materials at the same rates as bitcoin mining.

A human being writing stuff only uses as much energy as a human being doing just about anything else, though.

So yes, while ending coal would cost some miners jobs, the net gain is worth it. But adopting AI in standard practice in the entertainment industry does not have the same gains. It can't offset the human misery caused by the job loss.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The lack of rationale and reason in your response actually causes you to look conservative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What if we were finally able to get insurance companies out of healthcare in the US? Thousands would lose their jobs, but millions would suddenly be able to get care. So much money would be saved, but so many people would suddenly be out of work.

I don't know about you, but I hate paying several hundred dollars a month (and 100s or 1000s if I actually get care) to prop up a whole ass middleman between me and my care.

Anyway, my point is we can't keep old systems only for the sake of preserving jobs. The guy you're replying to is short sighted and relying too heavily on a language imitation program, but he's essentially right about not keeping jobs just because.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@new_acct_who_dis Yeah, but that wouldn't hurt as much because all the people out of work would still have healthcare.

AI displaced creatives will lose their healthcare.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)