this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
140 points (99.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
577 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (43 children)

I am aware of the concept of being transgender I am just wondering what your "polite disagreements" are with it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (28 children)

I'd say that a fairly debated topic related to transgender people, which isn't just transphobes attacking people trying to live their own life, is the presence of transgender athletes in competitions. Some will take it as a personal attack whether you take a side or sit on the fence. I'm not looking to start that conversation here, but yeah. It's definitely possible to hold a polite conversation about this while disagreeing on parts of the question. In a healthy space.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I think that after HRT the difference is not that big. Trans athletes may even be at the disadvantage since there are some cis woman that have higher than average amount of testosterone.

In the long shot I think it would be for the best to abolish gender based separation altogether and replace it with something more like weight categories.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Consider two 5'6" 65kg athletes, one man and one woman, are you saying that the man doesn't have an advantage?

I used to believe the same until I saw the recent Women's Premier League in Cricket. They had to reduce the size of field and the weight of ball. Even with that, the fastest bowl in the tournament was 130kmph while that speed is considered a "slower ball" in men's cricket.

Now some of these female cricketers earm more than any Pakistani male cricketers. Which is fair, bigger market, bigger payout. But female cricketers don't stand a chance against the male cricketers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Consider two 5'6" 65kg athletes, one man and one woman, are you saying that the man doesn't have an advantage?

No, my MMA teacher was female and she'd kick my arse regularly

They had to reduce the size of field and the weight of ball. Even with that, the fastest bowl in the tournament was 130kmph

Now you're undermining your first point, you're not comparing same heights and weight. Physics is real.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay.

Ellyse Perry, the fastest bowler in women's cricket is 176cm at 60kg (amazing athlete, represented Australia at both Cricket and Football world cups!). Her fastest ball was 130.1kph

Shoaib Akthar, the fastst bowler in men's cricket is 180cm at 80kg. His fastest was 161kph

Laws of cricket dictate that women should use a ball that is between 415⁄16 and 55⁄16 ounces (139.98 and 150.61 grams); which could be up to 13⁄16 ounces (23.03 grams) lighter than the ball used by the men.

Also made me think, the whole height-weight distinction will only work in purely physical sports like boxing (maybe even some american sports like baseball and nfl). It is not going to work in global sports like Cricket and Football. Think about the greatest footballers of our generation. Cristiano was 183cm (6ft) and Messi 169cm (5ft 6in).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So his mass is 33% more and the ball goes 23% faster? Momentum is mass x velocity iirc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
  • his mass is 33% more and the ball goes 23% faster? Momentum is mass x velocity iirc.

Do you understand why this statement is wrong?

You’re mixing the mass of the person throwing the ball with the mass of the ball.

  • his mass is 33% more

This would matter if he was flying himself at the batsman.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the bowler is giving momentum to the ball?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Correct. The bowler is contributing to the velocity part of the equation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I only pointed out the difference between the fastest. There’s plenty of shorter, leaner bowlers in men’s cricket who bowl faster than Perry. Kemar Roach for instance is in the same height and weight category as Perry and regularly bowls 150kph

Tbf it’s expected. You know women going below 16-18% body fat is completely unhealthy while top male athletes are perfectly healthy at 6% or so

Edit: wtf mate? Momentum is not mass of propeller times velocity. By your logic a sumo wrestler would easily be the fastest cricket bowler!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Momentum is mass x velocity. Google it.

Would you rather get hit by a featherweight or heavyweight? Mass matters

I'd say the difference between men and women's cricket will reduce as women get more training and money, I don't see any reason why not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes dear friend, momentum is indeed mass x velocity. But we’re not talking about the speed at which the bowler runs. It’s the speed at which the bowl is propelled.

(to be clear, the lower mass of cricket ball in women’s cricket is a factor in reducing momentum. But we’re talking purely speed here)

Some women cricketers (outside Pakistan) earn more than Pakistani male cricketers already. And I must say, I’m a huge supporter. Unlike the WNBA in the US, women’s cricket is way more popular in rest of the world.

It’s a biological factor that women, generally, aren’t as physically strong as men and as a supporter of female athletes, abolishing gender boundaries is practically killing women’s sports. Here’s some more data you could’ve found out by googling: https://boysvswomen.com/#/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure. Women's football is doing very well now that it's getting more money and attention, as are motor sports.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is doing very well indeed! Why kill it?!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is a surprise for you: HRT actually does things to your body. I don't think this should have been that hard to find on your own, but I can't judge your circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Transphobes always make the same tired arguments about "biological differences between men and women" and then scream and run away when you bring up actual science, because they don't care about the science. They care about being bigots, and using science to make their bigotry look legitimate.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)