this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
2096 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

45549 readers
2711 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
2096
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Thankfully Garuda takes care of all of this because I'm a moron. Would recommend for noobs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only problem is it runs pretty heavy as it focuses on being a modern distro for gaming.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah, it's literally just Arch Linux with the tweaked Linux zen-kernel, a crap ton of eye candy and a few GUI tools.
You could use the zen-kernel on a plain Arch base add their GUI tools (likely just by adding their repo to pacman.conf) and likely achieve better results/performance because you're not using resources on the flashy desktop effects and background processes instead having more available for the game.
Better yet, you could start with Garuda and strip it down and disable much of the resource heavy effects and achieve the same thing more or less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like that it takes automatic backups of my important stuff with btrfs because I'm too lazy to do it myself. I think that's the main reason it runs heavier. Probably better to do it your way if you know what you're doing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, it has nothing to do with BTRFS.
BTRFS is barely slower than EXT4; you wouldn't even notice the difference.
I use BTRFS on Arch with a plain KDE plasma desktop and it has no such slowdown experienced with the Garuda equivalent.
I believe it's because they enable a bunch of resource heavy effects, such as wobbly windows and have a few extra background processes; things not enabled or included in a plain Arch install by default.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the info.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)