this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
45 points (88.1% liked)

Programming

17352 readers
346 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A quick rant about weaknesses of agile

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Do you keep a shopping list? A personal to-do or reminders list? You should stop because that’s a ritual and rituals are clearly bad.

I mean, no, you should keep the rituals that help you work better and discard the rest. Which is what successful agile teams are already doing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

you should keep the rituals that help you work better and discard the rest.

For those using Scrum, that means keep backlog list and discard everything else.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

@btaf45 @mspencer712 The whole point of Scrum is to use the retrospective to stop doing what doesn't work and start doing what does.

At one point, when my team's workload changed to less-timeboxable work, we threw out the entire concept of sprints and just used kanban instead, and stayed like that for a year. We still did retrospectives on the old sprint cadence though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I jokingly suggested a similar crusade against sprints, because the nature of my team's work isn't prohibitively time-boxed either.

Wasn't expecting the people sitting on that zoom call with the power and influence to make such a change to actually agree

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole point of Scrum is to use the retrospective to stop doing what doesn't work and start doing what does.

That is only something useful if you can use the retrospective to through out Scrum. Otherwise it is yet another Scrum timewaster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@btaf45 in my case, we as a team could have done that, because we didn't have management dictating how we did anything. It was our choice to do what worked for us, and it was a valuable tool for dealing with whatever got thrown at us.

Now I'm working in a different place that dictates Agile and Scrum to be done Their Way, on top of a project that's largely waterfall-like to begin with, and I'm starting to see why people say it doesn't work.

It works, BUT, only when you're using it as the right tool for the right job and not when management decide to misapply it as a hot new planning methodology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@btaf45 tagging @programming so that this federates properly from Mastodon to Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of my project managers once described scrum as agile with training wheels. Which I think is a good description. It is useful for teams new to agile but once you get going you can start to throw out the parts that you don't need or that don't work for your team. But still useful to get you going initially.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@nous That's a good way of putting it!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)