this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3067 readers
237 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Actor Steve Coogan and presenter Carol Vorderman have backed Liberal Democrat pledges to reform how the UK's general elections are run.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

@theinspectorst @i_am_not_a_robot @Syldon @jonne I support PR, but I am concerned about keeping a constituncy link so everybody has a named MP. A modified form of STV would seem to be the way, with ATV for by-elections.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

@PamCrossland @theinspectorst @i_am_not_a_robot @Syldon @jonne

It can't be proportional and the existing level of constitutional representation without going to over 2000 MPs. PR in a Parliamentary system wrecks one person one vote for one candidate in a constituency.

Be careful what you wish for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Randomised voting.

Keep the constituencies exactly as they are, and each election everyone votes the way they do now.

Then instead of counting the votes, we shuffle them and pick a random vote and do what it says.

In aggregate this is proportional across the country, and also means every voter remains important in the constituency, you never know if the person you piss off today might personally vote you out tomorrow.

It also eliminates career politicians. Even in a safe seat you probably won't win three terms.

It'll never get used anywhere but it's fun to think about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@OhNoMoreLemmy

I'm all for random, Lords for a year for random picks over 55 years of age is very attractive.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)