this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

Books

10154 readers
1 users here now

Book reader community.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Johnathan Strange and Mr Norrell. After that book I gave myself permission to DNF though, so it was a maturing experience for me. I mostly wanted to know what happened to Stephen and that's what drove me, along with the "No mere book shall defeat me" attitude.

I really enjoyed all of the Fae short stories actually. I'm not really a horror fan, but I found Fae, and mortals interaction with it, particularly gripping and memorable. I never put the book down when I was in Fae, trapping me along with the victims, perhaps that's why I wanted Stephen to just be ok.

It was just everything else in the book I couldn't enjoy. The titular characters I found uninteresting. The setting, fae excluded, I was apathetic about. The structure, the footnotes, dear god the footnotes.

But the Fae stuff? I'll take 10 more of them in an anthology please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blasphemy but you can always Google if you just wanna know one thing but can't finish. I did to the WoT and don't regret it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I could have but for the other two reasons I wrote about. Namely, I wasn't mature enough to DNF, and the Fae stories are really good.

I suppose in the end it did one better by causing me to grow as a person. Sure, books have taught me a bunch of stuff but not many I can describe as being "the" reason I "grew".

Today I wouldn't have read enough of JS&MrN to even hear about Stephen, let alone grow to care about him.

I'm sure I'm missing out on a great number of good books, great books even, possibly even formative books, by how willing I am to DNF. But, there's so many good books out there that my calendar always seems to be full anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)