this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
875 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2470 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Gfycat service is being discontinued. Please save or delete your Gfycat content by visiting https://www.gfycat.com and logging in to your account. After September 1, 2023, all Gfycat content and data will be deleted from gfycat.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I guess it's just impossible to make these types of large media storage sites profitable. The business model itself is inherently unprofitable despite there being a need for these sites. Like youtube will never bring a cent back to google, but they keep running it because it locks people into their ecosystem for data harvesting.

Could also be that snap bought gfycat just to kill it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Youtube is definitely bringing back a profit to Google. Probably not huge, but definitely far from 0% return.

Now they did have to shove way more ads in there to make it happen.

Having an acceptable ratio between ads and a big media storage seems pretty much impossible, unless subscription based which most people can't really afford.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least Google is smart enough to not put limit caps on video views or posts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that's what they meant. I'm pretty sure it was a reference to twitter limiting the number of posts a user can see.

Though it seems google is going to limit the number of videos someone can see if they have an adblocker installed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well of course, the algorithm does that so YouTube doesn't have to lol

load more comments (14 replies)