Technology

58012 readers

3055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

353

Maestro, a Linux compatible kernel written in Rust. (blog.lenot.re)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Enter Maestro, a unix-like monolithic kernel that aims to be compatible with Linux in order to ensure wide compatibility. Interestingly, it is written in Rust. It includes Solfége, a boot system and daemon manager, maestro-utils, which is a collection of system utility commands, and blimp, a package manager. According to Luc, it’s creator, the following third-party software has been tested and is working on the OS: musl (C standard library), bash, Some GNU coreutils commands such as ls, cat, mkdir, rm, rmdir, uname, whoami, etc… neofetch (a patched version, since the original neofetch does not know about the OS). If you want to test it out, fire up a VM with at least 1 GB of ram.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 67 points 8 months ago (35 children)

Ok, I'm out of the loop and I've seen this often enough that I have to ask; why do people always bring up "written in rust"? No one points out that a given project is written in C++/C#/python/ruby etc, yet we keep seeing it for rust.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 8 months ago (14 children)

Programmers are hyped about Rust. It’s a programming language that has a legitimate chance to replace C and C++ for performance critical applications. So any new project in Rust increases the possibility of a future where C and C++ are programming languages of the past.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Imo rust won't replace cpp without true Oop so I might just make my own objective rust and piss off Oop haters

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

There has been no true OOP language since smalltalk, which btw wasn't class-based.

In practical terms Rust has subtyping -- barely, at least in technical terms the only thing that uses true subtyping is lifetimes. In practical terms you have qualified types (aka traits) supporting interface inheritance which is perfectly proper as everybody knows that you shouldn't inherit implementation as the Liskov Substitution Principle is undecidable.

"Language X will fail because it's not OO" what's this, the early 00s? I thought we left that hype train behind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The parent post was edited, wasn't it? I replied something to it, but the mentions of OOP have been removed. Am I going crazy? 🤪

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's why you always quote what you're replying to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And I’m confused why I got two comments going into the OOP tangent, when I made no mention about it at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apologies!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

No worries! I love conversations bashing on 00s-style OOP principles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

What is true OOP?

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments (30 replies)