this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)
NBA
5075 readers
19 users here now
| East - Atlantic |
|---|
| Boston Celtics |
| Brooklyn Nets |
| New York Knicks |
| Philadelphia Sixers |
| Toronto Raptors |
| East - Central |
|---|
| Chicago Bulls |
| Cleveland Cavaliers |
| Detroit Pistons |
| Indiana Pacers |
| Milwaukee Bucks |
| East - Southeast |
|---|
| Atlanta Hawks |
| Charlotte Hornets |
| Miami Heat |
| Orlando Magic |
| Washington Wizards |
| West - Northwest |
|---|
| Denver Nuggets |
| Minnesota Timberwolves |
| Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Portland Trailblazers |
| Utah Jazz |
| West - Pacific |
|---|
| Golden State Warriors |
| Los Angeles Clippers |
| Los Angeles Lakers |
| Phoenix Suns |
| Sacramento Kings |
| West - Southwest |
|---|
| Dallas Mavericks |
| Houston Rockets |
| Memphis Grizzlies |
| New Orleans Pelicans |
| San Antonio Spurs |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Feels weird to me we're constantly talking about issues with the "two timelines," and now Warriors are trying to hit again in the draft. Why draft another prospect who is inevitably going to ride the bench when your window with Curry is starting to close? Kuminga is at least playable for some minutes, and you can do much worse than him in the draft.
If you are not going to blow it up, then I think it would be a lot better to package Kuminga for another player at least, and then you can try to contend next year. Or just play him more. Despite the rumors, Kuminga has shown some promise at least.
Maybe this is the smoke to get other teams to the table for Kuminga + picks for a starter level player? Otherwise it only makes sense as a step to the next step which it trading the pick they get for guys.
Then again lightyears ahead of whatever.