472
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -5 points 4 months ago

So that's the change you want to see in the world. Technical linguistic grammar takes precedence over political outreach.

I fully support your desire to spread vocabular competence. My impression from your first post was that you had other priorities.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Despite the erasure of the words’ meanings in the public consciousness, the concepts still exist.

If you have new, sexier names for the concepts which will accelerate their reintroduction into the public consciousness, I’m all ears.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago

It doesn't have to be sexier terminology, or even different terminology. Just don't drop the word "liberalism" into a conversation and expect the average person to understand what your talking about.

You could use "corporatism" which has kind of taken over that definition in common language. I know it's technically incorrect, but language also isn't static outside of academic disciplines. But ultimately you can use whatever language you want, just don't assume a particular definition will be understood without explanation.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago

The only people I know of who don't know what the word "liberal" means, especially in the context the person above was using it, are very ignorant Americans. To be clear, even though I don't like most Americans, I'm not blaming them for being ignorant in this particular case because they have been subjected to decades of mostly uncontested propaganda deliberately obfuscating the term. But most of the rest of the world knows what everyone is talking about when saying "liberal" and knows it's a right wing ideology. And everyone shouldn't have to hold up the conversation to preemptively explain what the word means to those who don't already know. People are generally expected to pick up the gist of a sentence or point via the context of what's being said. The context was perfectly clear and it just sounds like concern trolling to go on about needing to hand-hold and dumb down the terminology being used for "the average person."

[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

And everyone shouldn't have to hold up the conversation to preemptively explain what the word means to those who don't already know

Well, if you know that the person doesn't know, giving definitions can be a helpful way of setting up your argument, but obviously these lemmitor assholes are just wasting your time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
472 points (97.2% liked)

World News

31537 readers
702 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS