this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
102 points (98.1% liked)

MapPorn

3171 readers
1 users here now

Discover Cartographic Marvels and Navigate New Worlds!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
102
Power generation capacity by source in the western US (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Images are from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's interactive map.

The hydroelectric marker for Grand Coulee Dam is not to scale. It should be larger. If drawn to scale it would dwarf the nearby markers.

According to the overview, the map does not include small producers in order to limit the number of markers. For the following sources, only producers above the specified cutoffs are shown:

  • Hydropower: above 5 MW (Idaho) or 20 MW (other)
  • Natural Gas & Wind: above 10 MW
  • Biomass: above 1 MW
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[ā€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

In central CA we're paying up to like $0.50 per kWh šŸ„²

[ā€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I pay .15$, but Iā€™m also in the middle of nowhere OK.

[ā€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Similar for me in the upper midwest.

load more comments (2 replies)