this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
549 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
6076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
549
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edward Zitron has been reading all of google's internal emails that have been released as evidence in the DOJ's antitrust case against google.

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it.

The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then the VP of Engineering, Search and Ads on Google properties, had called a “code yellow” for search revenue due to, and I quote, “steady weakness in the daily numbers” and a likeliness that it would end the quarter significantly behind.

HackerNews thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40133976

MetaFilter thread: https://www.metafilter.com/203456/The-core-query-softness-continues-without-mitigation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (20 children)

Sundar Pichai

Satya Nadella

Shantanu Narayen (CEO of Adobe since 2008)

Tech companies with Indian CEOs have defined and refined rent-seeking over innovations.

Unlike Brin, Page, Zuckerberg, Gates who had interest in technology and the product, these are just fucking yes men who exist to please the board by trying to keep the line going up, as long as they're not required to take risks themselves.

They'll buy competition, give shit pay to employees, and cut costs even if that harns the company in the long run.

Fuck them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Satya Nadella turned MS around after the disaster years under Balmer. Your racism is blinding you if you think that he's a problem - from a product perspective or from profit perspective.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not to take up for his point, but windows 10 was in development years before Nadella. The only version of windows totally under his governance has been the disastrous windows 11. So I guess I have him to thank for finally giving me the kick in the pants to fully switch to Linux.

I guess the point I need to make is that Microsoft was not good before or during Nadella. There have been bright spots, but not enough for me to have then outweigh all the other crap pulled both during and before Nadella.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Windows is only a small part of MS.

Nadella gets a lot of/all the credit for Azure which is the only legit competition to AWS.

O365 has been great for their adoption too.

And then there's all the "free" dev tools like GitHub (acquisition), typescript, vs code etc. which bolsters their image.

I can't even imagine ms under Balmer giving away that much shit. Hell, I wanted to build apps for lumia and they wanted to charge me an arm and a leg just to get started. This was at a time when their store didn't have anything going for itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)