Eric Posts URLs

55 readers

5 users here now

Eric found these things on the internet

Go ahead and cross post to other communities and share what you like

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

LogLog Games | Leaving Rust gamedev after 3 years (loglog.games)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Such a long article. Ain’t nobody got time for that. Haha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (7 children)

how far did you get?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn't read the whole thing. I used ChatGPT to summarize it haha.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hope it provided an accurate summary. I think the original was more verbose and detailed than they needed to be.

I think their main point boils down to what most people already know about dynamic vs static type systems. Prototyping is stunted with static type systems. It's the same reason why so many people use Python but critical, large projects typically avoid Python or only use it as a glue/wrapper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The article discusses the author's decision to stop using Rust for game development after three years, highlighting several challenges faced with the language in this context. Rust's strict borrow checker and the requirement for frequent refactoring are noted as barriers to rapid prototyping and iteration, which are crucial in game development. The author also critiques the Rust game development ecosystem for being too tech-centric, which often sidelines the "game" aspect of development. They advocate for a development approach that prioritizes quick testing and iteration over strict code quality, which they find Rust does not support well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That could have been a great introductory paragraph that could lead you into the details.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great! When I have more time I'll give it a read... just might be a few days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The discussion on [email protected] was pretty good overall if you're interested.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That's probably a better use of my time to grasp the article and what people think of it. Thanks a lot! I'll check that out.

load more comments (5 replies)