this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
652 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
4120 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
652
Möles (mander.xyz)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago

Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago

Those moles have seen some shit.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Americans will use anything but the metric system.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

At least they tried using it this time

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

i distinctly recognize those weird eyes

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's clearly more than a litter of mole

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least 1

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

And yet, no more than 1

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wüge

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wüge

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug

For anyone else confused about this comment. :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Wow, you guys are abstract!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Ok but why are they naked?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

The real question is, why aren't they wearing proper PPE?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Stupid question. Why are you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I’m uhh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Standardized mole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just two? We build whole societies, you know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This is a conjecture, at best.

How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Pokemon?