I feel like a lot of this is because non-crazy people find it harder and harder to justify identifying as a Republican.
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
33 points (92.3% liked)
politics
19125 readers
4111 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There's zero justification now. Oh, it's because you're a fiscal conservative? Okay, show me where that's a Republican policy. Oh, it's because you're a blue collar worker? Okay show me even a single policy that has helped you. Oh, it's because you're a veteran? Okay, why would you support a party that nuked your benefits? Oh, it's because you're a Christian? Then why would you support a candidate who embodies every single deadly sin packed into one blubbery package? The GOP isn't even a shallow shell of its previous ideals, it's just a wacky-ass death cult.
Wild that Republicans are becoming more in favor of gun control. Probably because they're seeing more people on the left--especially non-white, and non-straight people--getting strapped since both Republicans and Dems have utterly failed to address the causes of violence. (Hint: the tools of violence don't cause violence.)
The change doesn't really seem that great and there are years missing.
Also "Gun laws should be stricter" is too vague for the range of policies involved. When a gun control advocate says that they might mean bans. Someone else might be talking about opening up the NICS or want to improve the background checks somehow. There are also a lot of people who don't actually know the existing laws and want "stricter laws" we already have.
And the duopoly prefers it that way. If we are fighting each other we can't collectively fight them, the cause of all our issues
"I don't see a difference between the Fascist party and the Liberal party"
Look at you talking like there's a difference. Enablers of fascism are just as guilty as the perpetrators
This guy gets it
it's in the nature of political parties to get more extreme/partisan over time.
I'd recommend that you take a look at how other democracies do it. Especially the economically and socially successful countries in Europe. The US can learn a lot. But to one side of the aisle that's "radical socialism."
Europe has been a hotbed of radicalism for centuries, it really only calmed down after germany went crazy and was forcibly silenced ~80 years ago
Democrats aren't really extreme in any way... If anything, we need them to go as crazy to the left as Republicans have in their direction. Instead, they just let Republicans drag conversation ever rightward
there's plenty of things that many see as extremism in the Democratic platform.
The Democratic platform is not actually a thing that the party uses or strives to achieve.
Also, just because "many" think something is extreme doesn't make it so.
What "extreme" legislation has the party worked hard to enact since 2010?