this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
26 points (93.3% liked)

LEGO

3799 readers
2 users here now

Show off your Lego, discuss your MOC's and builds, and talk news and upcoming sets here!

Rules

1 No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

2 Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.

3 No porn.

4 No Ads / Spamming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I could be wrong, and/or it could just be the sets that get my attention have changed over the years as my interests change, but I feel that while the price/part has remained reasonable in many cases, it seems like there's a shift in focus towards small details, which while the sets look nice, means that you just don't get physically as much out of them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Was definitely expecting system to be more expensive over time but I'm pleasantly surprised

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Interesting stats. I could've sworn the PPP had gone up lately. So this means that sets have been getting more expensive not because part price increases but actual part increase ( more, smaller parts in a more intricate design). What's more surprising to me is that City, which is a System theme with supposedly no licensing, has twice the PPP of Creator.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's pretty much what I expected, which is really cool to see. The next number I would love to see is some sort of price per weight comparison. As @[email protected] pointed out, the next common argument is that LEGO sets have a lot more smaller pieces now, so if the PPP has stayed roughly the same, the price per weight should have gone up.