this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
820 points (98.5% liked)

science

14090 readers
574 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

100 million degrees C

Sounds hot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

One day we will break that record and nobody will ever know again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

One step closer to getting the T-51s working.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait for fusion reactors to not be thing for another 50 years at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Better in 50 years than never

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (10 children)

I'd like to know more. How do you actually harness the energy produced by temperatures that high? Is the end goal to figure out how to sustain the reaction at lower temperatures or do we actually have ways to generate electricity from those temperatures without losing most of it to waste?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Fusion triple product: the duration the thing works x inverse of how close you are to melting the reactor vessel x how large is the reactor vessel

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›