this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Improve The News

8 readers
1 users here now

Improve The News is a free news aggregator and news analysis site developed by a group of researchers at MIT and elsewhere to improve your access to trustworthy news. Many website algorithms push you (for ad revenue) into a filter bubble by reinforcing the narratives you impulse-click on. By understanding other people’s arguments, you understand why they do what they do – and have a better chance of persuading them. **What's establishment bias?** The establishment view is what all big parties and powers agree on, which varies between countries and over time. For example, the old establishment view that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote was successfully challenged. ITN makes it easy for you to compare the perspectives of the pro-establishment mainstream media with those of smaller establishment-critical news outlets that you won’t find in most other news aggregators. This Magazine/Community is not affiliated with Improve The News and is an unofficial repository of the information posted there.


**LR (left/right): 1 = left leaning, 3 = neutral, 5 = right leaning** **CP (critical/pro-establishment): 1 = critical, 3 = neutral, 5 = pro**

founded 1 year ago
 
  • The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Monday rejected Elon Musk's appeal against a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that mandated that he receive prior approval for Tesla-related tweets. The Hill
  • Musk had challenged the settlement's constitutionality, arguing that restrictions on his social media posts and Tesla-related public communications would violate his First Amendment rights. USA Today (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • Musk's bid to revise the settlement's terms was rejected by an appeals court last year. The SCOTUS decision indicates that the lower court's ruling stands, and the settlement's "Twitter sitter" provision, remains. www.axios.com
  • Musk's appeal stems from a 2018 tweet, in which he claimed to have secured the funding needed to take Tesla private at $420 per share. The tweet elevated the company shares and led to a temporary pause in trading. Associated Press (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • After the SEC alleged that the tweets had violated securities laws' antifraud provisions and brought an enforcement action against him, Musk paid a $20M fine, agreed to the "Twitter sitter" provision, and stepped down as Tesla's chairman. Forbes (LR: 3 CP: 5)

Establishment-critical narrative:

  • The SEC is unfairly policing Musk's speech and violating his First Amendment rights. The so-called "Twitter Sitter" clause unfairly inhibits his speech by threatening penalties for posting unapproved statements even if his words are true. Although Musk originally agreed to the provision in the settlement, the terms are unconstitutional, and the SEC has since misused it to limit Musk's freedom.
    BLOOMBERG (LR: 3 CP: 5)

Pro-establishment narrative:

  • There's no evidence to support Musk's claims that the SEC has improperly used its previous agreement with Musk to unfairly police his speech. Musk made false and misleading claims on social media that led to market disruption, and he agreed to a settlement to take responsibility for his mistake. The "Twitter Sitter" provision was put in place to ensure the same situation doesn't happen again and the deal should be honored.
    CNN (LR: 2 CP: 5)

Nerd narrative:

  • There's a 66% chance that Elon Musk will face US federal criminal charges or an SEC civil complaint before 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
    METACULUS (LR: 3 CP: 3)
no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here