Trademark's a weird one, if you don't defend it you lose it. So it's kind of a lose-lose situation from the trademarkers position. They have to pursue or they lose their trademark which they value
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
I mean, if they don't care about the actual usage, they could licence it for a buck or something
As a non-American, US intellectual property law feels absolutely ridiculous to me sometimes. It feels like it incentivizes all the wrong behaviours.
It's hard to balance but it prevents trademark squatters from existing like in the domain name space
As a US Citizen I agree. We also let corporations lobby to make the rules have no relation to what they were set up for.
Copyright for instance was supposed to allow people to use novel work in the open without getting copied for a short period of time before it became public domain. Now Copyright is nearly perpetual, it keeps getting extended when a certain mouse is close to losing their copyright.
My guess is that this is going to go the same way as McDonalds v everything with the letters M(a)c, and Starbucks v Sattar Buksh
I read way too much of that article
“Restaurant selling badly-packed-kebabs, is sued by content host showing videos of badly-packed-kebabs” The irony…
You forgot to include "stepsister" in the description.
Ive seen plenty of them
A trademark is always connected to the specific goods or services sold to customers with that trademark. You can’t register a word, phrase, symbol, or design as a trademark without specifically identifying the goods or services being used. Your trademark isn’t limited to one good or service. It can be used with many different goods or services, and include both goods and services.
Although the determination of whether you have goods or services can be confusing, it’s critical that you make the correct identification. Think about it this way: What do customers purchase from you? An actual physical product that bears your trademark? Or do they hire you to perform an activity for them? If it’s products, you have goods. If it’s activities, you have services.
For example, a registered trademark for the name A Good YarnTM for a bookstore would prevent another company from registering the name A Good YarnTM for another bookstore.
By being specific about the goods or services your trademark represents in your registration, you clearly identify the scope of use. You can legally prevent others from using the same or a similar trademark for related goods or services without your permission. Applying for more goods or services than you currently use, or intend to use, is likely to cause your application to be denied. We may inquire as to whether the identification you select accurately identifies your goods or services.
It's not quiet so cut and dry. The law is written to cover 90% but this isn't a criminal matter, it's a civil one, and civil suits are always decided in courtrooms. If I created a weed dispensary and called it Instant Pot and stylized my logo like that of a popular countertop pressure cooker they'd be well within their rights to sue despite being wildly different industries.
Reminds me how McDonald's lost their Big Mac trademark in the EU.
They had registered it as a restaurant name among others. So the EUIPO invalidated their big mac trademark, when they tried to get a restaurant chain called Supermac to change name. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ceciliarodriguez/2019/01/16/how-mcdonalds-lost-its-big-mac-in-europe/
It appears that the trademark was at least partly restored earlier this year, but I am not sure. I'm no trademark lawyer.
Well, with the picture cut off at first I thought it said "boner haus."
Well... You're looking for flesh in both places so 🤷♂️
BönerHaus?
Damn I knew verge was shit but they're just linking to other sites articles and presenting it as a tweet?
All I'm getting out of this is it's potentially possible to get doner kebab in the US, and I should take a trip to New York
There's tons of good doner kebab in the US, and you don't need to go to NY to get it. Sorry it's not in your area, though! That's a huge bummer.
They have a lot of gyros that aren't gyros and are actually turks doing kebabs so there might be more than you think
There's a place in Dallas with döner kebab in the name.
Yeah, but is it comparable to German doner kebab?
There's ten places with that in the name where I live, and all of them are pretending to be doner kebab
We used to have a pretty good German street food restaurant in Fresno of all places. They had a pretty awesome döner. Unfortunately that only lasted like 2 years before closing.
I live in a doner desert. I mean, there are places that CLAIM to have doner kebab around here, but they have apparently never been to Germany. There's something so perfect about Turkish food with heavy German influence that I haven't been able to find anywhere outside of Germany.
I'm glad you had two years of joy in Fresno, but sorry about the closure
"Come get stuffed"? "Big Doner Energy"?
Cmon
Mindgeek is within their rights
Wait until they see "Smoke Hub" in Bakersfield, CA.
It's literally the porn hub logo.
It's dumb but this is how trademarks work in America. If PH didn't do this then someone else could use this to show that they don't care about their trademark anymore. If PH isn't a dick they will let the kebab shop use it for a nominal licensing fee or let them change it over some period of time without fighting them too much.
There is a gas station in Iowa that uses the same logo. I think it's called like 1Nine or something like that.