this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
1380 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

9992 readers
1116 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

As a child I was really into dinosaurs and came to this conclusion shocked-dino

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

But which came first:

The chicken or the chicken's egg? Did the first chicken come from a chicken egg? Or did it come from a snake egg?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Based on the jpeg, this meme came first

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I recall reading somewhere that it would have been a proto- chicken kind of thing. Like not quite a chicken but it laid an egg and the first chicken came out.

Maybe a gene mutation of some sort.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Even that's not that clear cut. The mutants and the nonmutant proto chickens interbred regularly and different mutants showed up and also interbred. The real answer is there's no platonic ideal chicken but we really want to categorize this thing.

Edit: I guess the platonic ideal chicken is a man according to diogenes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The egg came first. To the chickens disappointment and, who left to find a more satisfying partner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Forget the chicken. What came first, the tardigrade, or the egg? Well, in this case, I think the tardigrade would have to exist first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

An egg is technically a single cell. So, eggs came first as those were the first forms of life.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess the tree branch needs to start somewhere, but why leave out amphibians?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thats on the branch labeled traitors that leads to paying bills.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they meant chicken eggs but I guess the chicken egg is still first in that case

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Yeah, this is silly (and fun) but avoids the real problem of course. The question can be like you said, "which came first, the chicken or the chicken's egg?" And for those that still want a literal answer, wikipedia says:

If the question refers to chicken eggs specifically, the answer is still the egg, but the explanation is more complicated.[8] The process by which the chicken arose through the interbreeding and domestication of multiple species of wild jungle fowl is poorly understood, and the point at which this evolving organism became a chicken is a somewhat arbitrary distinction. Whatever criteria one chooses, an animal nearly identical to the modern chicken (i.e., a proto-chicken) laid a fertilized egg that had DNA making it a modern chicken due to mutations in the mother's ovum, the father's sperm, or the fertilised zygote.

As an alternative, though it's a bit more of an ungainly mouthful, I like: "which came first, the first species to lay an egg or the egg of the first species to lay an egg?" That one is a bit harder but you might still be able to tease out an answer. That way I think it gets a bit more into the problem of qualitative vs quantitative when you do (which is partly why I say below that this is related to the problem of the heap). Of course it's really meant to be a philosophical problem anyway, and in that sense, it remains a paradox. It's a way of making an analogy for a "causation dilemma" and gets at the idea of infinite regress and the paradoxes that brings up. It's also related to the sorites paradox or the problem of the heap, which actually is an element discussed in Marxist (more because of Engels) dialectics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And now everybody together... C O E V O L U T I O N

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›