289
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 76 points 3 weeks ago

Thing that experts working in the effected field overwhelmingly predicted would happen, actually happens. Voters stunned.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the direct intent was to create hierarchical misery, all the voters are under the assumption it'll hurt the people that deserve it

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

The cruelty is the point, as usual. Making the world worse is OK as long as it hurts other Americans I don't like.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

If things get worse for them, it'll be better for me!

God can only create so much good stuff, so the less of it others get the more he'll give me.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Voters stunned.

Voters pleased with the choice they've made because of their insane religious beliefs. This is the leopard eating the other faces.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Texas has a massive voter suppression system in place, so this is a bit short sighted.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's both. I've spent plenty of time in Texas and trust me, there are more than plenty voters over the moon about this.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, I know. I spent 30 years in that hellhole.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

My condolences. I don't like giving away personal info on these sites, but I lived in a similar environment for a roughly similar period of time. I know how draining it can be and I'm glad it sounds like you escaped like I did.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Texas voters? Plenty of them are fine with this. God's will and all.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

And voter suppression.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

MAGoo logic. Our program is perfect. If there are failures, it's because we didn't work hard enough.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

And suppressed voters screaming they can't get their voices heard.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, a headline that violates Betteridge's Law.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

I know! It took me by surprise.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Betteridge’s Law...

"Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009, although the principle is much older. It is based on the assumption that if the publishers were confident that the answer was yes, they would have presented it as an assertion; by presenting it as a question, they are not accountable for whether it is correct or not. The adage does not apply to questions that are more open-ended than strict yes–no questions.

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Salute to republiQan women all over these United States. You’d be an inspiration if the slaves could have voted to stay enslaved. Kudos on your complete and total failure to support the women of tomorrow.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Dead Kids is called being Pro Life!

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
289 points (99.3% liked)

News

21860 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS