this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
763 points (97.7% liked)

News

22839 readers
3712 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Cool, but also cap property tax increases as well. Mine have increased over 10% for the last 3 years.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Can they even cap that? That's a state tax, I feel like that's one that you would need to deal directly with your state to resolve. As someone who lives in one of the highest property tax states, I also wish this could happen...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Is the property tax rate that's increasing or your home's appraised value? My home has doubled in appraised value since we bought it in 2016, so our taxes have doubled as well.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm curious what the federal government can actually do in this situation. Most private leases are contracts under state law, not federal law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And then roll it back to 2016 +5%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Oh neat, now if you can't afford rent (the issue) next year it will only be 5% more out of reach.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"politician expected to say that something we would want to should be a thing"

why is this news?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

This shit never works out as simply as you expect it to. With any public policy change there are layers and nuance. If you restrict rent increases then every year you're gonna see the majority of landlords including the ones who do not increase rent yearly suddenly change course to always up the rent 5% per year, every year. Otherwise as a member of the ownership class who doesn't increase rent your are losing out on equity compared to those who do. Compound interest never catches up.

If you want to make renting profitable and homeownership obtainable for nearly everyone you need to setup a system where renters gain a share of ownership proportional to the money they put in. Make it so ALL renters eventually own the place they rent if they stay long enough. Ownership increases for every dollar spent towards rent. Evaporate the double dip appreciation for landlords and punish the income so that you gain money but at a slower rate than an index fund.

You also need subsidized lending for individuals who own no home. Possibly make it so 100% of rental income tax goes into a fund that provides mortgages to someone purchasing a primary residence when they do not own any current properties or are selling their primary residence to purchase another one (e.g. moving, not hoarding housing.) Make the application process for these mortgages prioritize families without any owned homes in their direct lineage (e.g. those with parents and children which do not own homes get a higher priority than the kids of wealthy homeowners.)

Something like this can bring homeownership to the masses and bring prices down as investment income from housing is no longer as valuable as other investments. Prices may still stay high, but subsidized mortgages would keep monthly payments affordable for those who qualify while minimizing profitability for hoarders.

Finally if you are still in love with rent control, then do it concurrently with a program like the above. Balance the scales.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why would someone buy a house so someone else could slowly buy it from them? They would essentially be acting like a bank.

Who keeps up with the house maintenance?

Landlords are unneeded middlemen. A good system doesn't use them.

Your idea is "rent to own".

You can rent to own a Playstation that's 300 dollars for a small monthly price but at the end of the loan you're going to pay 600 dollars total for the Playstation.

Why am I going to go to Best Buy, buy a Playstation for 300, then let Jimmy down the street play with it while he slowly pays me back my 300?

Why am going to buy a house for 100,000 and let Jimmy rent to own it?

600 a month for 15 years. He'd pay for it.

If I put 100k in the S&P500 for 15 years, I'd have 415k.

Would I rather:

A. Help Jimmy get a house

B. Make ~300k for just sitting

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

5% raise cap is lame! way lower than wage increases! a 1000$ rent after 5 years is 1300$, which after 5 years becomes a 30 % increase

Him and his filthy rich Democratic politicians are so disconnected from reality that this seems to them like a revolutionary policy

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Here’s the thing, it provides at least some sort of predictability for tenant.

Nothing worse than settling into a place and getting booted because rent goes up 20% or 30%.

This will largely guarantee that rent goes up by 5% every year, but it will limit crazy jumps.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A year or so ago they surveyed the homeless in San Diego. Everyone assumed that the homeless population is largely from out of state, coming to SD to be warm while homeless. What they found was the complete opposite.

Most of the homeless do not have a drug problem or only started taking drugs after becoming homeless. Most homeless people were employed full time for the 12 months before they became homeless. Most homeless people in San Diego were born there and watched as the relentless march of 5-10% increases (California state maximums) slowly pushed them into homelessness.

Banal evil, is still evil.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The fear of a 30% rent hike has motivated several of my big decisions, and it happened once (luckily at a time where I could recover). But ya know, compounding interest - 5% every year is still exponential. Everyone's pretty sure the world's ending anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless that also comes with a 5% raise every year, then it's not as good

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Not better to cap it at 5% of the property value?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (14 children)

So if we can elect like, any old fuck now, can't we just go even older and elect the corpse of mao or something? cause that's kinda the only way I see rent, and rent specifically, becoming a non-issue in the near future. This is like one of the main issues which is directly symptomatic of capitalism, and which keeps capitalism as a system directly propped up. I don't really see any long term solution to it that doesn't involve a lot of no longer having capitalism. Other capitalist countries still have this problem. It's only like, china and the former soviet union and apparently barcelona with superblocks which are still gonna be subject to market demands and rates, it's only those countries which are going to be constructing such an excess of housing that a good amount of it can remain empty, which is also the case here as well but with the caveat that we still have massive amounts of homelessness and the empty housing is basically just to increase demand on top of straight up not having enough housing even were we to construct mass housing projects.

I dunno, this is a pretty good encapsulation of why we are specifically incredibly fucked and how this incrementalism isn't going to work at all to address our current issues. We're cooked, lads. Get the titanic band to start playing the song or whatever.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

God this is embarrassingly lame.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›