Of course, continuing this research I believe is important. Still, I don't like the framing of this article. It seems to me like it says something like conspiracies vs science. In reality there are plenty of valid concerns and criticism that come from within the scientific community, and only a few are mentioned in this article and very briefly.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
24 points (90.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5205 readers
748 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The laws of thermodynamics and atmospheric physics say no.
Engineers arent healing Earth. We heal Earth by: · withdrawing our grip, · practicing coliving with nature and our peers, · nurturing ourselves and our surroundings, · give a helping hand to those in need, · bringing power to people, not grippers.
I would never suggest this is the way forward, but the headline does say “help save”. I think a lot of this tech is BS. People put too much stock into things like carbon capture and other tech. But it might be a small piece of the solution
It might also be used as an inefficient way of papering over the cracks instead of addressing the root causes of the climate crisis.