The answer is no.
The reason why is that those in power are exceedingly wealthy, and the wealthy believe that the escalating climate crisis will not affect their standard of living in any meaningful way.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
The answer is no.
The reason why is that those in power are exceedingly wealthy, and the wealthy believe that the escalating climate crisis will not affect their standard of living in any meaningful way.
Which means that it takes bottom-up organizing to force politicians to address climate.
LOL
That's what everyone says, and then they vote for millionaires and multi-millionaires to represent us, as if those people have to listen to you or me about anything.
They need peoples' votes. Get even fairly modest numbers of people organized, and they pay attention.