Then you get all your property seized to make up for it. Simple as that.
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)
Canterbury, Kent
134 readers
10 users here now
A place in the Fediverse for the city of Canterbury, Kent (UK).
We welcome posts relating to:
- Local news.
- Upcoming events.
- Local photography.
- Questions about the city.
- Discussions on local matters.
Rules:
- Be nice to people.
- Don't post sensitive information about yourself or others.
- Don't post anything illegal.
See also:
Image attributions:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I tend to agree, they even still own them
Fuck these developers.
oh no, property developers can't afford to bribe the council? oh nooo oh noooo I feel so bad, think about all the predatory landlords that are missing out on somebody else's income oh nooooo
I see you didn't read the article. The landlords have gotten their buildings, it's the local community that's getting screwed since those funds were earmarked for local improvements.
...am I missing something or is this straight up bribery?
No, the money isn't for the council members it's "to provide facilities to a community following a development in the area." Developments that are needed as a consequence of the new housing.
which bit?
The developer promising payment to a council to approve a development.
Not if you dont actually make them.
- "That's cool you can owe us"
- wait
- put a monster fucking lien on the next thing the dev does, for unpaid debt.