this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
787 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
3817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone who has been surfing the web for a while is probably used to clicking through a CAPTCHA grid of street images, identifying everyday objects to prove that they're a human and not an automated bot. Now, though, new research claims that locally run bots using specially trained image-recognition models can match human-level performance in this style of CAPTCHA, achieving a 100 percent success rate despite being decidedly not human.

ETH Zurich PhD student Andreas Plesner and his colleagues' new research, available as a pre-print paper, focuses on Google's ReCAPTCHA v2, which challenges users to identify which street images in a grid contain items like bicycles, crosswalks, mountains, stairs, or traffic lights. Google began phasing that system out years ago in favor of an "invisible" reCAPTCHA v3 that analyzes user interactions rather than offering an explicit challenge.

Despite this, the older reCAPTCHA v2 is still used by millions of websites. And even sites that use the updated reCAPTCHA v3 will sometimes use reCAPTCHA v2 as a fallback when the updated system gives a user a low "human" confidence rating.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

This is actually a good sign for self driving. Google was using this data as a training set for Waymo. If AI is accurately identifying vehicles and traffic markings, it should be able to process interactions with them easier.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago (5 children)

As I understand it, the point of those captchas was never really "bots can't identify these things" (though you're right on that it was used to train). They use cursor movement, clicks, and other behaviours while you're solving it to detect if you are a bot or not.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago

The image choosing was always just to train their own bots

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's a combination.

Most captchas goals generally aren't 100% prevention, it's to put a workload in front, this makes spamming the site cost money, a bankrolled attempt could just as easily outsource the captchas to real humans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Since I started getting good at yosu and that fishing mini game in farmrpg I've been failing more captchas. I wonder if they're related knowing this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

The annoying thing is that they held us hostage for our free labor, but the results are proprietary for Google's benefit only.

That training data ought to be forced to be made freely available to the public, since we're the ones who actually created it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And yet I can't beat the CAPTCHAs because reCAPTCHA doesn't like VPNs lol

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Captcha these days isn't even really a CAPTCHA in the traditional sense since most of the work it does is based on filtering of IP and browser fingerprinting, with a certain level of gamification because the goal is not just to keep out the people they fight against, but to waste their time, would work great if it didn't waste normal people's time, while real bad actors have easy ways to get around it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I was going to say I’ve straight up just left whatever website I was trying to access because I was stuck in some endless loop of clicking on street crossings, buses, bikes, and street lights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So can we stop using those damn things? They're super annoying!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

I'm kind of hoping the AI permanently beats them. I hate them too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Aren't these Captchas designed to get training data for AI models anyway?

"System does what it was designed to do" doesn't feel that surprising...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Well yeah, I'd hope so, that's the entire point.

Catcha's data collection always was with the intent for training ai on these skills. That's "the point" of them.

It's reasonable to expect that the older version of captchas can now be beaten by modern ai, because they're often literally trained on that exact data to beat it.

Captcha effectively is free to use on websites as a tool because the data collection is the "payment", they then license that data out to people like OpenAI to train with for stuff like image recognition.

It's why ai is progressing so fast, captchas are one of humanity's long term collected data silos that are very full now.

We are going to have to keep progressing the complexity of catches as it will be the only way to catch modern AIs, and in turn it will collect more data to improve it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Yeah, my understanding is that these capchas were made to harvest data to use for AI/Autopilot driven cars. That's why they are always having you identify motorcycles, bycicles, crosswalks, stoplights, busses, etc. It's all stuff that automatic driving cars have had a hard time identifying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I fucking hate these. I've seen old people that don't know any better get stuck on these for at least 30 minutes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

it's super ableist. if someone has poor vision or colorblindness chances are they're going to miss things.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have regular everything and I still fuck them up. "click the ones with a fire hydrant". But a tiny piece of fire hydrant is spilling into another box. Does it count? Does it not count? Good luck!!

I had one the other day that was deep fried jpegs to the max. Like, what the fuck am I supposed to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (4 children)

When it's asking for motorcycles but it's clearly a scooter

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Or, like, "there's the bottom 10% of a traffic light in this one. Do I click that box? Ia that supposed to count?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (14 children)

What they are doing is comparing your answer and seeing if it is consistent with how it has been answered previously. They realize that not everyone is going to give the exact same answer, so as long as you answer it in a way that enough other people have answered it, it should let you in.

I'll usually go with the minimum number of clicks that I think will get me through, since I'm lazy and it'll also at times slow down how fast you can click which is annoying.

I'll also answer them wrong if I think it's a mistake that enough other people will make. "Yes... that RV over there is a bus..."

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That tip of a handle bar that makes you wonder if that square counts or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I had one with one of those Motorcycles with the long handles, apparently they aren't part of the bike, but the dudes foot holding it up is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Buster is awesome to get past recaptcha. I use it with my own Speech to Text API key since its free from Google. Using Google to beat Google.

https://github.com/dessant/buster

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, so if a visitor fails the v3 Captcha, v2 is used as a fallback?
That makes absolutely no sense.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

V3 isn't necessarily more effective than V2, it's just less obtrusive.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not quite: it'll drop a v2 captcha for you to solve when a v3 one can't clearly classify you one way or another.

So if v3 isn't entirely sure you're human, it'll make you do a v2.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And if you fail the V2, it'll just take your word on it and let you pass anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (6 children)

But, I cannot pass those 50% of the time... what does that mean?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

My score is lower.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I can see a future where the Internet is completely run by bots and AI to the point where no human actually uses the Internet anymore.

It's like an island that gets overrun with rats - there are just too many to deal with so you leave.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Some believe this happened years ago. Check out Dead Internet Theory.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Cool, so can Google shut it down now?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I fail more of those checks then these AI bots do. Surreal.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meanwhile I sometimes fail those. I have been locked out of applications because I missed a square of a bus, or perhaps because I like to be efficient in my mouse cursor movements. I ducking hate CAPTCHAs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

CAPTCHA doesn't stop bots, and let us be honest, it never really did. It frustrated the hell out of people though, and caused people to waste time doing these challenges. Meanwhile even before AI bad actors and bots could get past it simply by using captcha solver services run by exploited humans solving captchas for the service.

It's a display of security theater meant to make normies feel safe but in reality doesn't stop most bad actors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just close the page usually if I see one of these ones, I don't have the patience to click all the boxes and then it just sends you a different one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean, we literally train them by completing the CAPTCHAs. Why do you think you were picking things like bikes, traffic lights, cars, and busses? The only question now is what's next...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I never get the first one and rarely the second one. If it says to click all the squares with motorcycles and it’s just the one big picture, am I supposed to click stuff like the tire and mirrors? I always do and never get it right. Then most of the time they ask me to identify motorcycles, they show me motor scooters and what am I supposed to do then? I think I just need to get one of these bots to do it for me.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the new ones suck so fucking much though

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Technically the "correct" answer is set by the highest percentage of people choosing it. EG: 19 people select Box A and 1 selects Box B, then the machine decides Box A is in fact correct.

That means these AI could be selecting the wrong answers for all anybody knows, if enough of them are answering the prompts, and still passing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Thank God this means i can stop wondering if i should click on the... the 13 pixels from the fucking bike in that one corner square or wondering if i should count the scooter as a motorcycle fuck i am so tired of that shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Great, so now can I get an add-on to my browser that skips these?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›