If we're doing this, we need to do it right.
Let's get a horse race announcer to do the political live coverage. That way the entire 14 hour broadcast will all be one long sentence.
Just crazy ideas!
If we're doing this, we need to do it right.
Let's get a horse race announcer to do the political live coverage. That way the entire 14 hour broadcast will all be one long sentence.
Most of the more advanced democracies have rules about not allowing reporting of results until polls are closed for a reason. Many don't even allow reporting until official results are released. Informal exit polls and advanced opinion polls are bad enough.
The idea is for people to vote for who they think will be the best, not vote for who send to be doing well or poorly up to that point
Sure. But you're completely missing the point of this post. This isn't, "c/seriouspolicyproposals," this is "c/crazyideas."
And this is a gloriously crazy idea. With one simple change, simply publishing the results live, you can cause incredible chaos and turn elections into a complete circus. It's a wonderfully crazy idea!
Satire aside, preliminary counts wouldn't really correlate with a final outcome directly anyway. Kind of like polling, but with even more time variation and weird feedback effects like you point out. It certainly could be interesting as a view of the process over time (e.g. which candidate gets more early votes), but lacking pertinent or useful information. Any conclusions drawn would likely be fallacious and psychologically driven.
I don't think the post deserves the downvotes though. It is a crazy idea after all.
Not sure why you're being downvoted. This is definitely a crazy idea. Not a good idea, but a crazy one.
Yeah, people tend to miss the point of this place. This isn't "so crazy it just might work." It's "this idea is legitimately insane, but it's so ridiculous I love it."
100% people are downvoting this from r/all (or whatever it's called on Lemmy) without seeing the community.
At -2 currently. Hopefully that changes.