this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
409 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58813 readers
4632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously broke up in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 44 minutes ago

... 7 members of Hezbollah injured.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 32 minutes ago

It was probably an emergency exit hatch for the magic rocket gas.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That's actually quite impressive because most satellites just don't do anything when they die. Boeing's vehicles die with flare, and depressing regularity

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago

"in space no one can hear you scream"

Boeing satellites: "AHHHHHH!!!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

Great, more bits of dangerous junk in orbit. The fuckers should have to clear up their mess before it fucks up other satellites.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 hours ago

What, was it blowing a whistle?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is slightly concerning. Satellites don't tend to explode on their own, but it is a Boeing design with a history of leaky propulsion, so who knows?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Sure it was a Comm satellite for the world's tensest area, which is about to go to bigger war.

who would have ASAT capability at GEO?

how could it be launched to GEO undetected?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago

If you’re a government, you can pretty much put anything in a rocket fairing and call it a reconnaissance satellite.

The only warning that actually has to be given is that a rocket is being launched, so you don’t accidentally trigger WW3 by setting off launch detection satellites without warning. After it’s in space, no one can really tell what was in the fairing. Could be a spy satellite, could be navigation. Could just be a box with a bunch of little rockets in it, designed to slam into whatever you want at ridiculous speed.

But it’s way more likely that this was just Boeing having a tiny leak in a propellant tank, or a bad thruster and as soon as the concentration of propellant and oxidizer got high enough, it triggered a detonation. They certainly have a history of not leak testing their shit: airplanes falling apart, space capsules with leaky thrusters, and now a blown up satellite point more towards incompetence than malice.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a trick question? Cause you might as well be asking a 1600s peasant how to develop film.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You burn a witch and pray.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Instructions Unclear : gave my wife Chlamydia.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago

Satellite: "But I wasn't boing anything wrong!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Rapid unscheduled disassembly.

Plus “Into pieces” is rather unnecessary there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You can explode without turning into pieces, though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Arguable. I’d say it’s the same but the size of the pieces varies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Where do pieces end and particles begin?

philosoraptor.jpg

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago

Was it a Satellite Max?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

did you know that high powered lasers are invisible to the naked without a sufficient particulate medium to pass through?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 hours ago

Good thing I'm wearing clothes.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Boeing: outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer and so on and still has the shamelessness of appearing surprised at the shit quality and reliability they deliver

[–] [email protected] 1 points 43 minutes ago

Sounds like that case of the sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-contracted killing in China that one time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I did read about this yesterday, and as far as I know the name of the sat is intelsat 33e and its for communication purposes. I'm curious to know what really happen, how it broke.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really into the stock market, but I would not buy Boeing at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Now would be the best time to do it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Assuming it bounces back up

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Their vehicles don't, so i wouldn't hold my breath

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

If it doesn't do it on its own, one of 2 things will happen:

  1. They get bought out, which almost always results in a bump.
  2. The government bails them out, which is an even bigger bump.
[–] [email protected] 62 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Man they are just on fire lately

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

~~on fire~~ rapidly decompressing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Lol I believe it would be rapid uncontrolled oxidation

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The satellite went boing boing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

No, not double boing. It went triple boing.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

...was designed and manufactured by Boeing Space Systems and launched in 2016. It provided broadband services, including internet and phone communication services, to parts of Europe, Africa, and most of Asia.

IS-33e was the second satellite to be launched as part of Boeing's "next generation" EpicNG platform. The first, dubbed IS-29e, failed due to a propulsion system fuel leak. Intelsat declared the satellite a total loss in April 2019, later attributing it to either a micrometeoroid strike or solar weather activity.

What caused IS-33e to break up in orbit remains unclear, however. Intesalt officials did observe that it was using far more fuel than it should be to maintain its orbit shortly after launching eight years ago, shaving off 3.5 years of its 15-year lifetime.

Could be a coincidence, but I feel "Boeing leaks" approaching "Samsung exploding" levels of memification (where they had washers, phones and some other things all exploding, and the look was not great).

Samsung shook the meme off, but I feel like Boeing will have a harder time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Samsung makes consumer grade products that are “easily” replaced or fixed. Boeing makes shit for the US military, and they will 100% get what’s coming to them when a Boeing military project spontaneously combusts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I do sort of feel that Samsung got a bit of a bad rep for their phones exploding because it wasn't really their fault. The company that made the batteries took shortcuts in the manufacturing process and that's what caused the fires. If they had followed the instructions Samsung had given them they would have been okay.

Although equally the company wouldn't have felt the need to take shortcuts if Samsung had made the batteries to a standard design.

load more comments
view more: next ›