this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
28 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

1292 readers
104 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

“People will either agree with that conviction or they won’.”

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Adobe executives need to embrace being dropped in favor of non-AI programs or be left behind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Adobe can fuck off and die

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Without constant influx of fresh art, AI will devolve into deep-fried absurdist memes. :)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

need to embrace AI or get left behind

It should be noted that we're hearing this a lot. But it should also be known that the only people saying it are the people making and selling AI.

Edit: I think I did hear this from Gartner, too, but from my experience, they have a bad habit of jumping onto hype bandwagons. So I'm taking it with a grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

How about we switch it around: "Artists are telling Adobe to embrace their creative needs or risk being left behind." Adobe is forgetting that Artists are the ones providing their revenue

[–] BrikoX 3 points 13 hours ago

Artists are dumb enough to still use Adobe, so they probably get away with it.

[–] possiblylinux127 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

* companies paying enormous fees

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Adobe execs need to be kissed good night to sleep in their beds. This is a very reasonable policy. Intellectual property rights are a thing that makes a lot of sense. The commons are definitely not being encircled by people who have names and addresses.

[–] possiblylinux127 1 points 12 hours ago

The interesting part is that Adobe has a lot of IP. You don't see them saying that you can freely use it.

[–] possiblylinux127 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BrikoX 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] possiblylinux127 2 points 8 hours ago

I would add Sumatra PDF and Okular to this list

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago

making their dogshit programs not even worth stealing at this point

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

It should be noted that Adobe can fuck right off, and computerized art is not the only kind of art. It is generous to even call it art. It’s still all called graphics in my opinion.

I think they’re worried.