this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
131 points (97.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4137 readers
20 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll probably stick to asking for oat milk instead of "porridge water" or whatever the new mandated name will be. To be honest I do think calling it "milk" lets them inflate the price when it is essentially porridge water.

(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The trade mark isn't worded like they're saying they're milk.

The term "post milk" makes me think "better than milk" which is accurate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I just call these oatly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I love dairy milk, especially and exclusively UHT Milk. But fuck the dairy industry so much.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

This is stupid on the surface, BUT “milk” in some jurisdictions is protected with legal standards. This prevents watering down or other issues.

I am not familiar with the UK, so I don’t know if this is applicable.

In the US, “ice cream” is protected and has to meet standards, otherwise it is called a “frozen dairy dessert”.

Additionally, in the US we recently had a massive butter recall from Costco because it did not label “dairy” as an allergen. Common sense indicates butter contains milk, HOWEVER, these allergen labels are the law and the allergens feed into downstream items. IE, if you use the butter to make brownies, then the brownies must be labeled. If you automate this process or whatever, you could miss this, due to it not being labeled correctly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, on the surface, it looks like evil cow farming lobbyists trying to force the competition to use a stupid name.
But on the other hand, without a protected name, what stops corporations from lacing their milk with 20% oat milk and hiding it in the ingredient list to save cost?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd buy that. If you want to replace 20% of my animal product with plants and can do an ok job I'm down.

As long as it's labeled properly and you don't have to do anything crazy, it's at the very least something I'll try.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, nut and grain milk are much more costly, so I doubt that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

not during production

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

your reasoning behind the law and it's purpose is spot on, I think.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Courts don’t define words, people and dictionaries do. And this was in the telegraph which means it BS anyway. Ignore and don’t click

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›