That avocado and tomato post took me out, that and the Legos. Very impressive.
The most obvious ai one for me was the last cat picture, somehow it just screamed ai
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
That avocado and tomato post took me out, that and the Legos. Very impressive.
The most obvious ai one for me was the last cat picture, somehow it just screamed ai
To me 4 was pretty obvious as a lot of the lines made no sense, such as the ones right below her face.
Also, is there a correlation between image generator and accuracy?
Is there any chance that the human artists experimented with AI and posted the result along with their usual work? :)
Can people tell tell
Huh, I felt the 12/20 was a bit low but I guess not so much. As someone that has never used an image generator (or an LLM for that matter, chatGPT not even once baby) nor has actually worked at tech (though I have been learning programming on my own) and doesn't even know how to draw... I guess I didn't do too bad.
8/20 and I use it everyday. I got all humans correct, but the landscape and stylistic images is what I got wrong. Ai is getting good.
AI just has a niche. Certain things, like highly stylized images, it's great at because they're generic, and genetic/common is what AI does best.