this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1723 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2769 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you miss phones with replaceable batteries? By 2027, you won't anymore because, by law, almost every smartphone will have them again.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am curious how Apple will get around that this time. I’m almost sure this will be as funny as the whole story about the USB-C cables

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Super capacitor instead of battery. lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Simply remove the battery and sell iPhones with magsafe battery pack cases instead?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Yurop did it again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have mixed feelings on this. I think there were a few good reasons to move to sealed batteries. In an ideal world you could give consumers choices between the various trade-offs and offer multiple models or variants.

But of course that will never happen because non-replaceable batteries present a far better business case. If they were forced to offer options, the manufacturers would deliberately make the user-replaceable models far shittier and then complain to the regulators that they were unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

However, there is an exemption for high-performing and durable batteries until 2027. This means devices with high quality batteries that retain over 80% of their capacity after 1000 charge cycles do not need to comply with the removable battery requirement until 2027.

So premium phones like the iPhone would be exempt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Manufacturers aren't going to make a different model for the rest of the world. It's much cheaper to just make one model.

A good example is Tesla models 75D and 100D - they both have the exact same battery pack but the 75D is electronically limited so that the range is less than on 100D so it's cheaper tho it's the same car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They would just "underdevelop" other areas to make their phone "breakable" or "prone to accidents". I am not that hyped because of that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had an S3 for ages because you could get a replacement battery for like $12. Upgraded to an S10, can no longer swap the battery. Biding my time.

I hate this forced upgrade/payment model and how phones seemed to double in cost almost overnight.

They're even trying to get sneakier with the contracts. 3 years now to payoff your device, instead of 2, but the payment is the same. Absolutely bonkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›