this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
348 points (96.8% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35491 readers
566 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
A perfect example for why having an adblocker is a necessity these days.
I first used uBlock origin 2 years ago and I will never go back to browsing without an adblocker
I'm not sure how people do it without an Adblock it drives me absolutely insane, cannot live without uBlock
Moral imperative.
Chances are, unless you made the website yourself, you don't know who made certain decisions; who did specific work; how many people were actually available to do that work; how much pressure from shareholders there was to maximize income at the expense of user experience; any fiduciary challenges faced; or how often you had to overcome the urge to make a worthwhile product to further your goal of fitting as much ad space into a single page as possible (this one is HUGE).
the even more disturbing trend of late is that
- nobody made any decisions
- nobody did any specific work
- nobody was available to do the work
because an AI generated the entire content on the basis of an off-hand suggestion plugged in by a Search API directly reading some user's query and shitting out a vapid, insipid extrapolation of that query in the rough shape of an article on-the-spot and brute force slamming SEO algorithms with keywords so it's the first ten items you see when the search concludes.
I don't get why some people just refuse to use ad-blockers. They work absolutely flawlessly and I have not encountered an experience such as this in almost a decade.
Just DNS alone would have blocked all on that page.
Ublock origin
Does that work for what looks like some apps internal browser?
It looks like Firefox or mull to me
Just click to open directly in Firefox, it's an extra step but well worth it
Click where? If this is from an in-app web browser, like Google News for instance, there's no way to link it back to Firefox AFAIK.
3 dots in the GUI, typically will have the option to open in your default browser
Even worse is taking over the back button / back gesture to redirect you to "more to read before you go"
Yeah I really wish Firefox ignored all of the dynamic "pages" or whatever it uses that causes back to just go to a different part of the same page. Go back to the last page that I clicked a link on. I know how to scroll back up.
Absolutely, use an adblocker. You might even find that "reader mode" works just as well to force articles to be coherent.
I think the funniest part is that the browser even blocked some crap the site wanted to shove at you by default. This isn't even the intended experience!
It is your fault for not using an adblocker /s
I'm not sure how to change the default browser that the Google news feeds opens up to on a pixel phone. Ever since posting this though I've been looking at other launchers with a need feed that let me open it in another browser.
You can't. Even when Firefox with uBO is your default browser and any other app just uses Firefox as the built-in browser, Google News will resort to Chrome.
Workaroud: Open the website in Firefox instead of using the app - https://news.google.com/
It will open Firefox or whatever your default browser is if you delete chrome or freeze it.
It won't open the usual webpage though, it will open and create a new tab in the browser, at least that is the behavior that I face with Firefox Beta.
For me (on Firefox non-beta) it just opens the in-app browser and shoves ads down my throat. I just checked it, Chrome is disabled and cannot be uninstalled on my phone.
When I have a page opened in the Google News App, I can tap the menu and select to open the web page from there. Then it gets opened in Firefox.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It will open Firefox or whatever your default browser is if you delete chrome or freeze it.
I've tried this solution and it doesn't work. Chrome is running within the Google News app. Even if you modify Chrome on your phone to have adblockers, the version of the browser that Google News opens is unmodified.
Yeah, I have two solutions for you:
-
Get rid of the Google feed which is crap, and a total BS that it doesn't support your default browser unless disabling or getting rid of Chrome, you can use an app like Discovery Killer to get rid of it and replace it for another app, as I'm currently using Kvaesitso I have no need for doing that (Discovery Killer currently frozen), I can't recall if the app needs root though (root FTW anyway).
-
Continue to use it if you enjoy trash news sites with clic baits and such, you can block ads at a DNS level, through android settings or if you have a PiHole at the house, personally I use AdAway rooted version (root FTW x2) and my PiHole at house and with a VPN outside, I'm pretty sure AdAway tooks first, but meh, let's have some redundancy 😂
I'm pretty sure that could have been mentioned in this thread but I just wanted to explain my setup.
You need to disable the setting to "open web pages in the app", you can find it in the general section in the Google feed settings. If your default browser is not chrome, it should open in that browser.
If you don't want to change launchers, you can use the blockada app. Activates as a vpn and blocks ads device-wide. https://blokada.org/#download
load more comments
(2 replies)
That's why I use Firefox (Fennec to be exact) on Android with uBlock Origin.
…otherwise, I agree with the message. Developers are fighting the process, decisions, environment and often other development decisions along the way.
It’s time for a cool, refreshing Pepsi.
/s, as needed.
I'm working to overcome a particularly troublesome piece of technology right now and enjoying a cold, refreshing, Diet Dr. Pepper, so I guess the sentiment stands.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I would just not read it. It's not worth it. Get back to my stupid memes.
And people wonder why nobody actually reads the article. Far easier to just read the headline on Lemmy and the expert commentary in the comments.
I recommended you use an alternative browser like Samsung Internet, or a Chromium fork called Cromite (UI like Chrome but without Google services). They, along with Firefox, Edge etc. have ad blocker support.
After finding one you like, go into Chrome's app settings and click "Disable" in the middle, so Google Discover won't force you to open in Chrome even if it's not your default browser.
With Firefox mobile now supporting plug-ins, it's easily the best mobile browser. I think it's the best desktop browser as well, but that's more debatable.
The ability to sync tabs from Firefox mobile to desktop and vice versa is a huge selling point of desktop Firefox use. I'm not well versed in the best desktop browsers but when I swapped three months ago to double Firefox I've been very happy.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Vivaldi browser is good for sites like that because you can use simplified view, which removes all the shit and just gives you the article text.
The Reading Mode app on Android does this too.
Here's some love for the reading mode
Probably not worth the read anyways. I disable the adblocker to gauge the quality of a website. If it's a complete ad cluaterfuck, I never go to the website again.
Get yourself ubo.
Fuck Amway.
Or don’t act like Ubisoft where you make teams develop some mechanic for 6 to 24 months only to can it in the end.
view more: next ›