this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
619 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

57435 readers
3629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

What if you have face unlock?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Criminal suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police under the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, according to a unanimous ruling issued today by Utah's state Supreme Court.

Police officers obtained a search warrant for the contents of Valdez's phone but couldn't crack his passcode.

At his trial, the state "elicited testimony from the detective about Valdez's refusal to provide his passcode when asked," today's ruling said.

"And during closing arguments, the State argued in rebuttal that Valdez's refusal and the resulting lack of evidence from his cell phone undermined the veracity of one of his defenses.

"While these circumstances involve modern technology in a scenario that the Supreme Court has not yet addressed, we conclude that these facts present a more straightforward question that is answered by settled Fifth Amendment principles."

"One of the major issues in the law of digital evidence investigations is how the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to unlocking phones," Kerr wrote.


The original article contains 499 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

What about biometrics?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I’m sorry, but this headline is weird to me because “I forgot my passcode” if a cop ever asks me for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's for including jurisdiction in the headline like we've all been asking for. V helpful.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›