this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2023
-2 points (0.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2166 readers
37 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lately I have been watching a friend play BioShock Infinite, something to which I paid little attention at the time of its release. At first the setting and the story were attracting me, as they pertain to my field of interest… but later in the story, after acquainting us with an archetypal capitalist, I noticed that the story was getting a little ‘darker’—in a familiar way—and it soon devolved into what I feared: another subplot about how much revolution sucks.

I’ve seen it already in The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles and Metro 2033, so I know how it goes: first the writers lure you in with a display of the prerevolutionary situation, and at first they portray the revolutionaries positively, but as the climax approaches the revolutionaries go around suddenly committing atrocities without any clear rhyme or reason, nothing can be done to prevent it, ordinary people hate it (so the revolutionaries abuse them too), and the lesson is that revolution is no better than the prerevolutionary situation.

Why do revolutionaries go through the trouble of making revolution? Not because the material conditions (whatever those are) made revolution inevitable, no. It’s because revolutionaries are stupid and unreasonable. Simple as that. That’s probably also why they commit atrocities, and also why they can’t figure out how to keep their supporters without resorting to coercion or violence.

The message, it seems, is an advertisement for conservatism: ‘Yes, we’ll admit that things may be awful now, but no matter how awful they may be, anything else would be worse, so just shut up and do nothing.’ They don’t state it outright—possibly because of how embarrassing it would look—but that is the only conclusion that I can draw. (Otherwise, the only alternatives are either that the writers wanted to subject innocent people to their angsty, immature whining, or they simply wanted to waste their time, both of which would be bafflingly unwise of them.)

Is there anything inaccurate about my observation? Because otherwise, I don’t know why these presumed professionals would suddenly subject us to this lazy and shallow writing.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

These revolutionary type storylines are definitely written like that on purpose. I'm noticing more and more that the "villain" of a story often starts out quite relatable, they want something that most of us want or at least understand, they want a more equitable and humane society in many ways. And then all of a sudden, for no reason at all in terms of the story narrative, they do something violent, and then they're definitely the "bad guy" cause they did violence. Often the "good guy" even says that they agree with the "bad guy" in principal, but if only they just went about it in a different way - namely non-violent reform, asking the government nicely, etc.

This is just another way in which the cultural hegemony of capitalism reinforces the perception that there is no alternative, and if you want to improve things you must work within the bounds of the system, lest you realize that it's the system itself which is the problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The plotline of every Marvel movie that doesnt have a white male as a protagonist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The recent Wakanda film was especially terrible on this sort of thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I started cutting people off for trying to talk to me about that movie. I've not been able to give a fuck about Marvel since the Avengers replaced the X-Men as the 'front-and-center' cape team; but when the Black Panther movies started dropping, that's when my DGAF metastasized into outright, total hatred.

Imagine naming a cape after the single most radical organization America has ever known, and then having that cape be the same Pentagon collaborating, military-industrial complex bootlicking piece of shit all your other capes are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Part of me believes there's a conspiracy to separate these names from their roots. If you look up Black Panther now you'll most likely have to sift through a load of capeshit till you find anything about the movement.

And recently Marvel announced a film about an Israeli hero called "Sabra" which is the name of a town where occupation forces committed one of the biggest massacres in its history. So if you look up "Sabra Israel" you'll first see some shitty Israeli Hummus brand, then marvel crap, and only then do you find something about the massacre.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The one I hate the most is the Falcon/Winter Soldier series. Halfway through the series a black man that was tortured and experimented on by the US government tells Falcon this about becoming the captain america:

"No self-respecting black man would ever wear these symbols"

And he is fucking right, but you know what is the resolution to his storyline?? Falcon inaugurates a statue with a 3 paragraph text explaining his story in a museum dedicated to the Oeiginal captain america. Literally a footnote on the history of the "great myth" of Captain America.

Its so ironic and infuriating bc that is exactly how Americans treat any of their past horrendous crimes. Its just a footnote on their history at best.

Native americans genocide? That was long time ago...

Slavery? Oh but the civil war...

Two fucking nukes on civilians? Not war crime because WWII or some shit

Concentration camps for japanese? Philippines genocide? Colonization on the Pacific? Apartheid? Imperialist agressions? Wiping out whole nations? Chemical weapons? Persecution of black movements? Radiation poisoning of native people on the pacific? Torture centers? Police brutallity? Keeping the whole world under surveillance?

That's bad, sure, but fuck China because Mao killed some feudal lords I guess 🥰#blm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not to mention the main "villains" of the show. All they wanted was a dignified life for everyone, but fuck them I guess cause they got angry and killed a few cops. So much for human dignity, you didn't ask the billionaire overlords nicely so forget about it.

Also the intro of the new Avengers manager type character. There was probably lots wrong with Sam Jackson's Nick Fury but he seemed neutral enough as far as Marvel goes. Julia Louis Dreyfus' character on the other hand... Is she supposed to be Madeline Albright or Hillary Clinton or something?