this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
46 points (89.7% liked)

Open Source

31217 readers
130 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Translation: It's proprietary "source available" software until January 2027, at which point it becomes free software and open source under the Apache 2.0 license.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It’s BSL so I guess open source but not “free software”?

Edit: okay as has been widely pointed out this is not an open source license. The text of the license says this. They have updated the post to (kind of) acknowledge this. They also state that this non-open source license “aligns strongly with our own open source goals and intent for Codecov at this time”, really committing to try to confuse whether or not they’re open source

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The BSL violates point six of the open source definition, so isn't open source https://opensource.org/osd/

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

I'd say it is open source but it is not libre software.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nope. The Business Source License isn't an open source license. https://opensource.org/licenses/ (not to be confused with the Boost Source License, which is open source).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It’s open core corporateware and shouldn’t count as free software regardless of the license.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

One of my favorite PR checks. Glad to see this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is it like a git* alternative?