DOI

Annotation: This investigative report delves into the casualties suffered by Russian forces during the conflict in Ukraine up to April 2024, shedding light on the significant human toll and the evolving dynamics of the war.

Keywords: Russia, Ukraine, casualties, military losses, conflict, investigation, analysis, forecast

Hashtags: #Russia #Ukraine #Casualties #MilitaryLosses #Conflict #Investigation #Analysis #Forecast

Editorial Comment: The findings presented in this report are based on extensive research and analysis conducted by reputable sources, including the BBC and Mediazona. However, readers should exercise caution and critically evaluate the information due to the complex nature of the conflict and the possibility of bias or misinformation.

Disclamer: This investigation was conducted in hot pursuit and needs to be thoroughly verified. All of the following may have a biased perception of the facts and may also contain signs of "stuffing" by the Russian special services, unprofessional verification, and other factors. Everything is your responsibility, including references to us as unverified sources. Once again, time, or rather the lack of it, does not play the best role in substantiating versions. Take everything as a version, nothing more.

Conclusion: The investigation reveals that more than 50 thousand Russian military personnel have died in the conflict in Ukraine since February 2022, with a significant proportion being individuals not formally affiliated with the army at the start of the invasion. The report highlights the human cost of the war and the challenges faced by Russian forces on the front lines.

Links: BBC, Mediazona, brcf-ua.blogspot.com

Editorial Note: The report provides valuable insights into the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the toll it has taken on Russian forces. However, readers are encouraged to verify the information independently and consider multiple perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

50 thousand dead: what do we know about Russia’s losses in Ukraine by April 2024 brcf-ua.blogspot.com April 5, 2024 View Original

Photo credit: STRINGER/AFP via Getty Images

About the article Author, Olga Ivshina Position, BBC The names of more than 50 thousand Russian military personnel who died in the war in Ukraine since February 2022 were established by the BBC together with the Mediazona publication (recognized as a “foreign agent” in Russia) and a team of volunteers based on open sources. At least 43% were not affiliated with the army when the invasion of Ukraine began. But most likely, the real share of those who left for the front “from civilian life” could reach 70% of all combat losses of the Russian side.

Among them are soldiers whose fate their relatives could not find out for two years.

“Glory to You, Lord! I exclaim involuntarily... And then emptiness, darkness. And then silence. And I come to my senses from a wild scream and sobbing! This is how I met on March 20, 2024, the news of the death and the coincidence of the DNA of my beloved son, Kirill, who suffered and begged from the Lord,” wrote Irina Chistyakova, the mother of a 19-year-old soldier who disappeared after a battle in the Kharkov region of Ukraine, on her page. in March 2022.

photo copyrightIrina Chistyakova

Kirill served on conscription and, unexpectedly for his family, signed a contract shortly before the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. His mother believes he was forced to do this. In one of the first battles, Kirill went missing. His remains were found only in March 2024.

Contrary to the promise of Russian President Vladimir Putin, conscript soldiers continue to take part in hostilities. We know the names of at least 101 conscripts who died during the invasion of Ukraine. Some of them died in the Belgorod region of Russia, guarding border positions and not formally participating in the war. But in fact, yesterday’s schoolchildren came under artillery and small arms fire almost every day, holding positions that were supposed to be guarded by professional units.

At the moment, 18% of all our confirmed losses are prisoners, 13% are volunteers who went to the front, 12% are mobilized.

For another 28% of the dead, it was not possible to determine their belonging to one or another group of military personnel or branch of the military. This is happening primarily because Russian officials are now providing far fewer details about the dead than at the very beginning of the war. However, in most cases, such obituaries are accompanied by photographs of the deceased in civilian clothes.

Based on this, we can assume that most of those who are now in our “no data” section had no relation to paramilitary structures before the invasion of Ukraine.

Taking this circumstance into account, it turns out that the actual number of those who went to the front “from civilian life” can reach 70% of all combat losses on the Russian side.

All the above figures are only those losses that we were able to confirm using open data: reports from officials and the media, publications by close relatives of the victims on social networks, information from memorials and burial sites.

The real number of deaths on the Russian side (excluding military personnel from the territories of the so-called “people’s republics”), according to our estimates, may be twice as high.

We came to this conclusion by systematically studying the situation in cemeteries in 70 settlements throughout Russia.

Read more about casualties during the Russian offensive Beginning in October 2023, confirmed weekly losses on the Russian side began to increase significantly. Since October 9, confirmed weekly casualties have risen to 550-600.

While in August and September, an average of 360 military deaths were confirmed every week. This jump coincides with reports of the start of a new operation to storm Avdeevka (in general, the battles for this city have not stopped since February 2022) and other settlements in the Donetsk region.

Between October 2023 and April 5, 2024, at least 1,014 Russian soldiers died (this number does not include those soldiers whose date of death is unknown).

Now many experts say that attempts to break through Russian forces in the Donetsk region have stopped. However, information about the dead comes late, so we continue to receive reports of those who were killed during this offensive, especially during the assault on Avdiivka.

In general, the figures we established for Russian losses in the fall and winter of 2023 are second only to the losses during the assault on Ugledar and Bakhmut in the winter and spring of last year.

The rate of increase in losses continues to be one and a half to two times higher than the average for the first 12 months of the invasion.

Main trends Contrary to earlier expert predictions, prisoner units continue to play an important role on the front line and continue to suffer high casualties.

First of all, this is due to the fact that the Russian army is increasingly using Wagner group tactics. It involves wave-like attacks by small assault groups in different directions. This method leads to large losses in manpower.

To replenish the composition of warring units, the Ministry of Defense uses a number of strategies. Firstly, the recruitment of convicts in colonies continues. However, now they will be able to be released not after six months at the front - as was the case before - but only after the end of the war.

image copyrightGetty Images

Skip Podcast Advertisement and continue reading. What was it? We quickly, simply and clearly explain what happened, why it is important and what will happen next.

episodes

End of story Podcast Advertising

The second way of replenishment is the recruitment of volunteers who want to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense. Just last year, local authorities in various regions of Russia admitted that they had “botched the plan” to recruit and send newly minted contract soldiers to the front.

For example, last year the city of Krasnoyarsk was tasked with recruiting 2,000 people.

“Each district has been given a plan. This plan is scheduled for the entire 24th year. So there are two signs. One sign shows that as of today, how much has been done of the total plan... And today, we have a shortfall in February - two people,” said the head of one of the districts of Krasnoyarsk, Yuri Savchuk, already this year.

“Considering that over the last year our contract soldiers have been mostly alcoholics, homeless people, whippersnappers, prisoners, and so on, the Central and Zheleznodorozhny districts are old, central districts, where there are fewer such teams than on the periphery of the city,” he encouraged official local deputy Vyacheslav Dyukov.

The military command, on the contrary, is now trying to protect the paratroopers and special forces who survived the first year of the war, using them to hold positions and sniper operations. Valuable specialists are now sent on the offensive only when favorable conditions exist, experts say.

Since the invasion began, Russia has lost at least 3,354 officers in Ukraine.

Including 1016 elite command-level specialists. In this number we included the dead officers of the Airborne Forces, Marine Corps, special forces, special forces of the Russian Guard, as well as military pilots.

The loss of precisely these officers may be the most sensitive and difficult to replace for the Russian army. If, for example, the commander of a special forces company dies, only an officer of the same military specialty can replace him. And its preparation requires at least four years of military school, and then another two to three years of service to gain relevant experience.

Moreover, in the structure of the Russian armed forces, as a rule, only officers are trained to synchronously interact with other branches of the military, especially with artillery. If these tasks are assigned to untrained or inexperienced commanders in high-stress situations, it can lead to a lack of coordination and increased casualties.

It was the lack of coordination and the inability to conduct more complex offensive maneuvers that became the main reasons for the suspension of the Russian offensive in Donbass, experts interviewed by the BBC note.

General assessment of Russian losses The total number of losses on the Russian side increases significantly if we include in the list those who fought against Ukraine as part of the “people's militias” of the self-proclaimed DPR and LPR.

From December 22, 2022, the DPR stopped publishing data on the losses of its troops (the so-called LPR authorities did not publish information about their losses at all).

Having studied published obituaries and messages about the search for LDNR members who have not been in touch for a long time, we came to the conclusion that by the end of February, about 23,400 fighters of the self-proclaimed “republics” of Donbass could have died.

We assume that we do not take into account approximately half of the actual losses of Russian units, since we rely only on open sources of information. Consequently, the real number of Russian military deaths may exceed 100 thousand.

And taking into account the dead from the DPR and LPR units, the total losses of the pro-Russian forces in the dead could be 123,400 people.

We continue to collect data on dead military personnel. If you would like to share information on this topic please email [email protected] or contact us here .

What do we think?

In Russia, new names of the dead and photographs from funerals are published every day. Most often, the names are given by the heads of Russian regions or representatives of district administrations, local media and educational institutions where the deceased previously studied, as well as relatives.

The BBC, Mediazona and a team of volunteers are reviewing this data and adding it to a list we have kept since the Russian invasion of Ukraine

We consider a publication in a Russian official source or media, publications by relatives or posts in other sources if they are accompanied by photographs of the burial as confirmation of death.

In the main calculation, we do not take into account the losses of the self-proclaimed republics of the LDPR. However, if a citizen of the Russian Federation voluntarily went to war and joined the armies of these republics, we take him into account.

We determined the types of troops by reports of where the deceased served, or by insignia on the uniform. Mobilized, volunteers and prisoners are not separate branches of the military, however, we highlight these losses in a separate category in order to compare them with the losses of professional (contract) units of the regular army.

“Other troops” in the schedule include air defense and chemical defense personnel, signalmen, doctors, ground services of the Aerospace Forces, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, automobile and railway troops, as well as military police.

Sign up for our email newsletter to receive the day's top stories every evening, Monday through Friday, plus context to help you make sense of what's happening.

Чорні Троянди: 50 тысяч погибших: что нам известно о потерях России в Украине к апрелю 2024 года https://brcf-ua.blogspot.com/2024/04/50-thousand-dead-what-do-we-know-about_41.html

Чорні Троянди: 50 тисяч загиблих: що нам відомо про втрати Росії в Україні до квітня 2024 року https://brcf-ua.blogspot.com/2024/04/50-thousand-dead-what-do-we-know-about_7.html

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ On the night of April 6, 2024, the Russian occupiers attacked with 32 Shahed-131/136 attack UAVs from the Primorsko-Akhtarsk and Kursk regions of the Russian Federation, as well as six missiles of various types: three S-300 anti-aircraft guided missiles from the Belgorod region, two X-101/X-555 cruise missiles from strategic aviation aircraft from the Saratov region, and one Kalibr cruise missile from the Black Sea.

💥 As a result of the anti-aircraft battle, the Ukrainian Defense Forces shot down two X-101/X-555 cruise missiles, a Kalibr cruise missile and 28 Shahed-131/136 attack UAVs.

Russian murderers continue to terrorize Ukrainians, striking at Kharkiv and other peaceful cities. Unfortunately, today we have dead and wounded, and our condolences to the families.

We are doing everything to get more tools to protect our people from the aggressor. Thanks to everyone who held the sky today! 🇺🇦 Together to victory! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🇺🇦 Commander of the Air Force Lieutenant General Mykola Oleshchuk

https://bit.ly/3JadoNY

A Russian disinformation network in Europe called "Dvoinik" is linked to employees of the National Media Group (NMG), German publication t-online reported on Wednesday. Comments from foreign experts for the bots' social media campaigns are taken by journalists from Channel One, Izvestia and REN TV, of which NMG is a shareholder, according to t-online.

Details. The publication t-online has identified two journalists from Russia who interview Western experts and politicians. The video then finds its way onto a network of fake pages and is massively distributed by an army of bots working in the Kremlin's interests.

▪️Экспертов are misled about the purpose of the communication and future posting sites. In particular, Simon Schnetzer, author of a series of studies on youth in Germany, was contracted by the administrators of Dvoinik as the author of the French-language site RRN.media. However, Schnetzer later discovered a video of his conversation on the Wanderfalke website, with the interview's summaries claiming to be about the seriousness of the French farmers' protests.

▪️Журналисты t-online looked into the leaks about the journalist who spoke to Schnetzer and other experts, as well as his colleague who arranged the interview. The interviewer turned out to be Vadim Chaika (pictured). According to t-online, he is 31 years old. He graduated from the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. He listed French TV companies France Télévisions and TF1 as his places of employment on LinkedIn. However, according to t-online, Chaika's employer was Channel One in 2020 and Izvestia newspaper in 2022.

▪️Вероятно, Vadim Chaika's age is incorrectly stated in the article of the German edition - he is not 31 years old, but 26 years old. This is confirmed by Radio Canada's publications about voting in the 2018 Russian presidential election, which mentions that Chaika was 22 years old on March 18, 2018, and the RANCHIGS news about Chaika's trip to the North Pole in 2017 (he was in his third year of university at the time). In 2017, Chaika went to France on the Neoma Business School exchange program. A year later, he traveled to Russia with a crew from the TF-1 channel. In 2021, Chaika was an employee of Channel One, according to leaks seen by "Agency".

▪️Второй journalist - Alexander (no surname is given in the text) - also works at Izvestia and REN TV channel. He is 28 years old and graduated from Moscow State University.

▪️НМГ and both journalists ignored t-online's questions. Chaika did not respond to the message of the "Agency" journalist either.

Context. The websites of the "Dvoinik" project started appearing in March 2022. They look like copies of well-known publications such as Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Spiegel, t-online, Welt, The Guardian, Le Mond, El Mundo. However, they do not write in the same way as the media they copy: the "lookalikes" disseminate Russian propaganda narratives. After the terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall, a fake Spiegel page appeared that portrayed Ukraine as a sponsor of terrorism. The "lookalike" publications were spread by bots on social networks, including on the X platform (formerly Twitter).

Photo: https://peertube321.pocketnet.app/images/5458d2e01a2fd2f8878a230e10998915/5458d2e01a2fd2f8878a230e10998915-original.jpg

https://bastyon.com/tomberuk?s=590b778161922da73cf2bf302e77eb694646e7db63072de026a8ad5eefbd4654&ref=PFHDJpEBn55p8HeXBBbknrDViVyXr6Be6e *** Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***

Here's a general overview of the steps that may be required:

1. Choosing and setting up a server: You can use cloud services such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), DigitalOcean, or your own physical server. You'll need to install an operating system (e.g., Ubuntu or Debian), configure network settings, and ensure server security.

2. Configuring PeerTube: PeerTube is a decentralized platform for sharing videos. You can install PeerTube on your server by following the official documentation and completing all necessary setup steps.

3. Yggdrasil, I2P, and TOR: These technologies relate to decentralized networks and Internet anonymity. They may require configuring individual programs or services on your server to work correctly. Each of these services has its own documentation and resources for setup.

4. Setting up a Mastodon instance: Mastodon is a decentralized social network similar to Twitter. You can install your own Mastodon instance by following the official documentation. This may involve configuring a database, web server, and installing additional software.

5. Security and maintenance: It's important to ensure the security of your server, regularly update software, and perform data backups. Setting up system monitoring may also be helpful in detecting and addressing issues promptly.

These are just general steps that may be needed to create such a server. Specific steps will depend on your experience, needs, and requirements for this server.

Hashtags:

#PeerTube #Yggdrasil #I2P #TOR #Mastodon #ServerSetup #Decentralization #Privacy #Security

Feel free to ask if you need more information or assistance with any specific step!

https://bastyon.com/index?s=0bf9113e354204adab21084c3156891c424a6a99a3e5e605c8a7113913437897&ref=PMC55eKCrsxoJNkiB3f71AgFLQC3T9HkWV

Annotation:

In this analytical report, we delve into the trial of Boris Nemtsov's murder, focusing on the recent testimony of Sergei Budnikov, an eyewitness to the crime. Discover the key revelations and lingering questions surrounding this high-profile case.

Keywords:

Nemtsov's murder, eyewitness testimony, trial analysis, Sergei Budnikov.

Rewrite:

Dive into the intricacies of Boris Nemtsov's murder trial as we uncover the recent testimony of Sergei Budnikov, shedding light on crucial details of the case. Join us as we dissect the trial proceedings and explore the implications of Budnikov's eyewitness account.

Hashtags:

#NemtsovMurder #EyewitnessTestimony #TrialAnalysis #SergeiBudnikov

Editorial Comment:

The Nemtsov murder trial continues to captivate attention, and Budnikov's testimony adds a new layer of complexity to the case. Stay tuned as we unravel the mysteries surrounding this tragic event.

Disclaimer:

This investigation was conducted in hot pursuit and needs to be thoroughly verified. All of the following may have a biased perception of the facts, and may also have signs of "stuffing" by the Russian special services, unprofessional verification, and other factors. Everything is your responsibility, including references to us as unverified sources. Once again, time, or rather the lack of it, does not play the best role in substantiating versions. Take everything as a version, nothing more.

Conclusion:

The testimony of Sergei Budnikov marks a significant development in the Nemtsov murder trial, offering insights into the events of that fateful night. Explore the full details of the case and ongoing trial in the provided links.

Keywords:

Nemtsov murder trial, eyewitness account, investigation, trial proceedings.

Links:

• Black_Roses
• InLeo
• NWL2024
• Спільнота OSINT Military / X
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO — РЕАЛЬНА ЗАМІНА ПРОПУТІНСЬКІЙ ПОМИЙЦІ
• Війна в Україні: Простір для обговорень
• Команда "Україна": Українські хайвіанці на службі Hive
• BASTYON - соціальна мережа та відеохостінг на базі блокчейну Біткоїн

Perfect!!! Here are the suggested 10 playlists, content plan, and pilot episode:

Playlists:

1. **Geopolitical Conflicts:###.

   • Wars and conflicts in different regions of the world.
   • Analyzing the political and military aspects.

2. Technological innovations:

   • Recent developments in technology.
   • Revolutionary inventions and their impact on society.

3. Historical documentaries:

   • Documentaries about key historical events.
   • Historical figures and their contributions to shaping the world.

4. Political Analysis:

   • Current political events and their impact on the world stage.
   • Expert opinions and analytics.

5. Cultural differences:

   • Study of cultural peculiarities of different countries and regions.
   • Discussion of cultural traditions and customs.

6. Environmental problems:

   • Analyzing environmental crises and problems.
   • Finding solutions to preserve the environment.

7. Economic Geography:

   • Study of economic systems of different countries.
   • Analyzing world markets and trends.

8. Sports and fitness:

   • News from the world of sports.
   • Tips on fitness and healthy lifestyle.

9. Interviews with experts:

   • Conversations with leading experts in various fields of knowledge.
   • Experienced advice and viewpoints.

10. Psychological analysis:

    • Discussions on psychological aspects of behavior and interpersonal relationships.
    • Practical advice on personal development.

Content Plan:

• Weeks 1-2:

  • Preparing content for the Geopolitical Conflicts playlist.
  • Conducting interviews with political analysis experts.

• Weeks 3-4:

  • Filming and editing documentaries for the "Historical Documentaries" playlist.
  • Preparing materials for the Political Analysis playlist.

• Week 5-6:

  • Running a pilot episode with selected content from various playlists.
  • Collecting feedback from the audience.

Pilot episode:

Title: "Global Conflicts: Analysis and Perspectives"

Content:

• An overview of current military and political conflicts in the world.
• In-depth analysis of geopolitical aspects of the events.
• Expert opinions and forecasts on the further development of the situation.

This pilot issue will allow to study the audience preferences and evaluate the effectiveness of the content in order to further increase the audience and improve the quality of the information provided. *** Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***

Плейлисты:

1. Геополитические конфликты:

   • Войны и конфликты в разных регионах мира.
   • Анализ политических и военных аспектов.

2. Технологические новинки:

   • Последние разработки в области технологий.
   • Революционные изобретения и их влияние на общество.

3. Исторические документальные фильмы:

   • Документальные фильмы о ключевых исторических событиях.
   • Исторические личности и их вклад в формирование мира.

4. Политический анализ:

   • Актуальные политические события и их влияние на мировую арену.
   • Экспертные мнения и аналитика.

5. Культурные различия:

   • Исследование культурных особенностей разных стран и регионов.
   • Обсуждение культурных традиций и обычаев.

6. Экологические проблемы:

   • Анализ экологических кризисов и проблем.
   • Поиск решений для сохранения окружающей среды.

7. Экономическая география:

   • Исследование экономических систем различных стран.
   • Анализ мировых рынков и трендов.

8. Спорт и фитнес:

   • Новости из мира спорта.
   • Советы по фитнесу и здоровому образу жизни.

9. Интервью с экспертами:

   • Беседы с ведущими специалистами по различным областям знаний.
   • Опытные советы и точки зрения.

10. Психологический анализ:

    • Обсуждение психологических аспектов поведения и межличностных отношений.
    • Практические советы по развитию личности.

Контент-план:

• Неделя 1-2:

  • Подготовка контента для плейлиста "Геополитические конфликты".
  • Проведение интервью с экспертами по политическому анализу.

• Неделя 3-4:

  • Съемка и монтаж документальных фильмов для плейлиста "Исторические документальные фильмы".
  • Подготовка материалов для плейлиста "Политический анализ".

• Неделя 5-6:

  • Запуск пилотного выпуска с выбранным контентом из различных плейлистов.
  • Сбор обратной связи от аудитории.

Пилотный выпуск:

Название: "Глобальные Конфликты: Анализ и Перспективы"

Содержание:

• Обзор актуальных военно-политических конфликтов в мире.
• Глубокий анализ геополитических аспектов событий.
• Экспертные мнения и прогнозы по дальнейшему развитию ситуации.

Этот пилотный выпуск позволит изучить предпочтения аудитории и оценить эффективность контента, чтобы дальше наращивать аудиторию и улучшать качество предоставляемой информации.

Добірки каналів відео - PeerTube (xy-space) https://tube.xy-space.de/c/buterintv/video-playlists

It turns out that over the past year the number of Russian dollar billionaires has grown from 110 to 125 people. This is the highest result in the history of the list of the world's richest businessmen.

For some - a great war of liberation, and for others - a great way to improve their financial situation. It always has been, it always will be. The only nuance is that the Russian authorities are trying hard to sell people a non-existent legend about the struggle for "Russian peace", while they themselves are making money at the expense of Russia and realizing their geopolitical ambitions.

At the same time I can say that a historical event has happened: ordinary people and oligarchs have for once converged in their views. Everyone has caught the essence of what is happening, and now everyone is making money on the war as much as they can. Some people are raking in whole factories, while others are waiting for a military payment on their cards.

It is the state grandfathers who are frantic with the feeling of inevitably approaching death, that's why they organize senseless bloodbath. Everyone else is just making money. So the war in Ukraine is not a war of liberation, but of enrichment.

https://bastyon.com/black_roses?s=ab4405c038d26db3d8f133015a33a17b23e0a86ad1b8dc0d066404f1441ff7cb&ref=PLnYfkF5nRoPAbw9QbiKAvqNnhdtjjiGVs

Как это было (много архивных фото) babel.ua4 min View Original Первый документ, похожий на паспорт, советская власть ввела в 1919 году. Это были «трудовые книжки», которыми рабочие прикреплялись к определенному предприятию. А еще по ним выдавали карточки на продукты, что было главным в условиях тогдашнего продовольственного кризиса. Но такой документ выдавали лишь в нескольких крупных городах, например, в Москве и Петрограде. В остальных регионах местные власти еще использовали бланки царской России или придумывали собственные справки и свидетельства удостоверения личности.

После окончания Гражданской войны и образования СССР, в 1923 году ввели единое для всей страны «удостоверение личности». В нем были графы: фамилия, имя, отчество; дата рождения; место жительства; профессия; семейное положение; наличие детей; данные о воинской службе. С 1925 года для жителей городов ввели прописку. Фото в такое удостоверение вклеивали по желанию владельца, а главное — получать его было необязательно. Обязательными были только паспорта для выезда за границу.

В конце 20-х годов крестьяне стали массово бежать в города от принудительной коллективизации. Поэтому для контроля миграции в 1932 году в СССР ввели внутренний паспорт, который стал единственным удостоверением личности. В новом документе, кроме тех граф, что были в прежнем «удостоверении личности», теперь указывались национальность, социальное положение, отметки о приеме на работу. Для жителей союзных и автономных республик текст печатался на двух языках: на русском и на языке республики. Вводилась и обязательная прописка паспортов «не позднее чем через 24 часа после прибытия на новое место проживания».

Главной особенностью было то, что паспорта выдавали только жителям городов, рабочих поселений, новостроек, достигшим 16 лет, а также госслужащим и работникам совхозов. На большинство крестьян новая паспортная система не распространялась. Их с 16 лет добровольно-принудительно записывали в колхоз. И они не могли выехать дальше райцентра без справки от колхозного руководства.

За самовольный выезд наказывали денежным штрафом, а за повторное нарушение была уголовная ответственность — до трех лет тюрьмы. Нередко главы колхозов и сельсоветов или сотрудники НКВД за взятку выдавали справку, на основании которой можно было получить паспорт. Особенно это было распространено после Второй мировой войны, когда в села вернулись солдаты с «трофеями из Европы». На эти трофеи они покупали себе паспорта и оседали в городах.

На первом этапе паспорта выдавали в крупных городах. В Украинской ССР это были Киев, Харьков, Сталино (сейчас Донецк) и Днепропетровск (сейчас Днепр). Вокруг них устанавливалась 50-километровая режимная зона, которую «зачищали от кулацких, уголовных и иных социально опасных элементов». Для борьбы с нарушителями паспортного режима в НКВД создали внесудебные «тройки». В 1938 году в паспорта стали вклеивать фото, второй экземпляр которого передавали в органы милиции. Также появился буквенно-цифровой код, в котором зашифровывалось наличие судимости и статья — политическая, хозяйственная или уголовная. Таким образом паспортные столы и адресные бюро стали первыми картотеками для всесоюзного розыска.

После смерти Сталина в 1953 году в СССР провели новую паспортную реформу. Паспорта получили жители приграничных территорий, Балтийских республик, работники железнодорожных узлов. На треть сократили количество режимных территорий. Но для большинства колхозников мало что изменилось. Новый генсек Никита Хрущев затеял реорганизацию сельского хозяйства, в частности освоение целины. Поэтому крестьяне снова остались без паспортов.

Когда в 1964 году к власти пришел Леонид Брежнев, то первые годы он занимался внутренней борьбой в Политбюро. Только после его окончательной победы вопрос о паспортизации крестьян решился поднять уроженец Луганщины, первый зампредседателя Совмина и будущий министр сельского хозяйства Дмитрий Полянский. Его поддержал и глава МВД Николай Щелоков, которому не хватало данных для «более успешного выявления антиобщественных элементов».

Решение откладывали до 28 августа 1974 года, когда Совмин утвердил новое «Положение о паспортах в СССР». Вводились паспорта нового образца: красного цвета, вместо зеленого; сократили количество граф; появились страницы для фото в 25 и 45 лет; смягчили правила прописки.

Но главное — его выдавали в 16 лет всем гражданам, в том числе и жителям сел. Теперь колхозники получили относительную свободу передвижения, но они по-прежнему не могли устроиться на работу в городе без справок от колхозного начальства. Новые паспорта начали выдавать в 1976 году, а к концу 1981-го их получили около 50 миллионов крестьян. С этим паспортами они и встретили развал СССР в 1991 году.

Хотите больше интересных исторических текстов, поддержите нас донатом.

https://bastyon.com/black_roses?ref=PLnYfkF5nRoPAbw9QbiKAvqNnhdtjjiGVs

Беспаспортный система заставляла крестьян наполнять закрома СССР за трудодни | Новости на Gazeta.ua https://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/history/_bespasportnyj-sistema-zastavlyala-krestyan-napolnyat-zakroma-sssr-za-trudodni/615805?mobile=true

17 марта 1937 года в СССР был принят закон, лишивший крестьян свободы передвижения. Имеется в виду паспортная система, которая не распространялась на крестьян. Паспорта вводились только для жителей городов, рабочих поселений, новостроек и совхозов.

В Большой Советской Энциклопедии 1939 года указано, что паспортная система представляет собой "порядок административного учёта, контроля и регулирования передвижения населения путём введения для последнего паспортов ...". Закон действовал до середины 70-х годов прошлого века.

Начиная с 40-х годов, на протяжении десяти лет советской властью было издано множество нормативных документов, которые развивали и "совершенствовали" институт прописки, все больше ограничивая право граждан на свободу передвижения, свободный выбор места работы и места жительства.

До 1953 года в Советском Союзе режимными были признаны 340 городов, местностей и железнодорожных узлов. Кому выдавать паспорта и прописывать в режимных зонах решали соответствующие органы власти. Так же и кого причислять к неблагонадёжным категориям людей, которые после этого становились бесправными. Крестьяне, как и во времена крепостничества, оказались намертво привязанными к родным очагам. Они должны были наполнять закрома Родины за трудодни или вовсе бесплатно, поскольку другого выбора им попросту не оставили. В колхоз добровольно-принудительно записывали с 16 лет всех, кто жил на его территории.

"В документах о паспортизации не было указано о лишении крестьян выдачи паспортов, а просто, что село не подлежит паспортизации. И крестьянин автоматически становился крепостным, в полном смысле этого слова, прикреплённый к колхозу. Без паспорта нельзя было уехать из села, не то что устроиться на работу. Этим пользовались местные "князьки". Выгоняли колхозников с работы, если кто-то чём-то не угодил. Особенно страдали женщины, которые были объектом притязания бригадиров или специалистов. Не пошла на встречу в интимном плане, увольняли. А если человек был безработным в течении трёх месяцев, его называли тунеядцем, что каралось уголовной ответственностью. В нашем селе Макеевка были осуждёны на исправительные работы около 150 человек. Когда я уже преподавал в школе, ко мне обращались многие, чтобы помог получить паспорт. Потому что тогда, чтобы получить паспорт, нужно было два разрешения - председателя колхоза и сельсовета. Я писал жалобы в газету "Известие". Оттуда присылали шаблонный ответ, ничего мы не можем сделать, потому что села не паспортизированы. Мол, принудить к этому председателя колхоза и сельсовета мы не уполномочены", - рассказал Cazeta.ua 67-летний Валентин Хижняк, историк из села Макеевка Смелянского района Черкасской области.

Каждый колхозник был обязан обзавестись справкой из сельсовета, удостоверяющую его личность, которая действовала не более 30 дней. Выдавали её исключительно с разрешения председателя колхоза, чтобы пожизненно записанный в его ряды крестьянин не вздумал оставить коллективное хозяйство по собственному желанию. Из села можно было убежать только в случае, если поступить на учёбу или пойти в армию. После сельские ребята массово шли на заводы, строительство, в милицию, оставались на сверхсрочную службу, только бы не возвращаться в колхоз. Можно было завербоваться на комсомольскую стройку, лесозаготовки, разработку торфа, строительство в отдалённых северных районах. Паспорт завербованному выдавался только на срок действия договора, максимум на год. После чего бывший колхозник всеми правдами и неправдами пытался продлить соглашение, чтобы перейти в штат постоянных работников.

"Я помню, когда уже изменилась ситуация с паспортами, был свидетелем одной ситуации. Председатель колхоза за что-то ругал шофёра. Угрожал работнику, что отнимет у него машину. А шофёр вытащил из кармана ключи и швырнул ему в лицо, если так, то и возьми. А пожилые люди сидят и говорят: "О, в то бы время этот Евдоким Минович так ключи не бросил. Даже если бы председатель сам сказал положить ключи на стол, то Евдоким Минович упал перед ним на колени и просил бы прощения ", - вспомнил Валентин Михайлович.

Паспорта сельским жителям СССР решили выдавать только в 1974 году. Новое Положение о паспортной системе гарантировало получение паспорта всеми гражданами, достигшими 16 лет. Правда, крестьян запрещалось принимать в городах на работу. Процесс полной паспортизации начался в 1976 году, а завершился лишь в 1981 году. За этот период сельскому населению было выдано 50 миллионов паспортов.

Минобороны: Теракт в «Крокусе» сподвиг (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28822) многих россиян пойти служить в Вооруженные силы по контракту;

На двери кабинета депутата-«иноагента» Бориса Вишневского уже появилась (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28823) соответствующая табличка;

3 года колонии запросили (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28824) юристу пермского «Мемориала» Александру Чернышову по обвинению в «контрабанде культурных ценностей»;

Мосгорсуд отклонил (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28828) апелляцию на арест Исломова Исроила — владельца автомобиля, на котором приехали нападавшие на «Крокус»;

Суд утвердил (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28829) приговор в 6 лет в воспитательной колонии петербургскому школьнику Егору Балазейкину за попытку поджога военкомата, ;

Из школьной программы убрали (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28833) повесть «Кавказский пленный» из-за «ЛГБТ-пропаганды», которую там нашли депутаты;

Суд оставил (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28834) в силе административный штраф за пикет незрячей активистке;

Рассмотрение кассации на приговор Владимиру Кара-Мурзе отложили (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28835) из-за того, что колония не доставила в Верховный суд позицию политика;

Суд снова отклонил (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28838) апелляцию по мере пресечения петербуржцу, обвиняемому в «призывах к терроризму» за «оппозиционные надписи в магазине»;

Глава Татарстана призвал (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28839) предприятия региона самостоятельно защищаться от атак беспилотников и не надеяться на ПВО;

Публицисту и советскому диссиденту Александру Скобову вменяют (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28840) в вину пост о подрыве Крымского моста — «Мемориал»;

В парламент Грузии внесли (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28841) законопроект «Об иностранном влиянии» и конституционные изменения «О запрете ЛГБТ-пропаганды».

Ознакомьтесь с обращением представителей российских независимых редакций и правозащитных организаций в поддержку нашей журналистки Антонины Фаворской! (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28661)

Подписывайтесь на группу поддержки Антонины Фаворской! (https://t.me/freefavorskaya)

Помогите участием в сборе на передачи в СИЗО Антонине Фаворской! (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28659)

А также читайте статью о том, как в Кыргызстане принимали закон об «иностранных представителях». (https://sotavision.world/zakon-ob-inostrannykh-pre…)

https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28842

https://bastyon.com/index?s=dc286f67096edbb35f87a58610e5eea0ff0aa7e1f86bfd1a855e5cdbb1500d98&ref=PLnYfkF5nRoPAbw9QbiKAvqNnhdtjjiGVs

Михаил Самарский: мы пытаемся научить мух добывать мёд. update: 03-04-2024 (22:25)

Демократию можно построить там, где её желает народ. Если народ против, хоть разбейся, ничего не выйдет. России демократия не нужна. Демократов россияне называют "дерьмократами", либералов – "либерастами", Европу – гейропой, Америку – исключительно "пиндостаном". Для большинства населения права человека – это разврат, бардак, болтовня и вседозволенность. Попробуешь доказать обратное, тут же тебе кричат: "Не нравится, вали из России!". Уехал – всё: предатель, агент, экстремист. Бесполезно, дискутируя с "правильными патриотами и защитниками отечества", приводить какие-то исторические факты, документы, воспоминания очевидцев, вырезки из газет – всё объявляется фейками и фотошопом.

Термин "фейк" настолько понравился власть имущим и их пропагандистам, что они готовы его употреблять в любой ситуации. Взял взятку – фейк, получил откат – фейк, украл бюджетные деньги – фейк.

Впрочем, с тем, что чиновники не чисты на руку, соглашаются все – и противники режима, и запутинцы. Но самое интересное то, что сторонники Путина не видят в воровстве ничего предосудительного. "Ну, а тебя поставь мером или губернатором, – спрашивают они, – ты разве не станешь воровать?". Если вы ответите "нет", засмеют и покрутят пальцем у виска. То есть россияне, идущие во власть, априорно стремятся там хорошенько заработать, так хорошенько, чтобы хватило и им, и их детям и внукам с правнуками. И общество не возражает, главное – чтобы что-то оставалось народу на хлеб, колбасу и бутылку беленькой или красненького.

О каких либеральных ценностях, правах человека, демократии можно говорить в таком обществе? Люди молча взирают на новые рекорды: журнал Forbes опубликовал ежегодный рейтинг богатейших людей мира. В него вошли 125 миллиардеров из России — это число стало рекордным, причём количество российских миллиардеров могло быть даже большим, но десять человек из числа богатейших бизнесменов после начала войны отказались от гражданства РФ и, естественно, теперь они "миллиардерят" в других, вражеских, странах – предатели и изменники! А вот оставшиеся миллионщики – наши, родные, патриоты.

Я не знаю, как изменить эту ситуацию. Знаю лишь одно: дальше так жить нельзя. Как спасти этих людей? Давайте думать сообща, без ёрничанья и зубоскальства. Вопрос наисерьезнейший!

С одной стороны, не могу не назвать героями тех, кто отдал жизнь за будущее России, кто не остановился перед репрессивным аппаратом всемогущего диктатора, и отправился за решётку. Как не восхищаться их решительностью, бесстрашием, отвагой и самопожертвованием?

А с другой – всё это похоже на то, что мы пытаемся научить мух добывать мёд.

https://bastyon.com/index?s=9c5c5e903a0866632132e604ff456846369b0f4e2b649300fc484e5a084b4440&ref=PLnYfkF5nRoPAbw9QbiKAvqNnhdtjjiGVs

Most people may not see the whole picture of the meaning of crypto technology and not use it to its fullest potential for several reasons:

1. Lack of understanding of technical aspects:** For many people, the concepts behind cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies can be complex and difficult to understand. This lack of technical understanding may hinder their ability to use cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms.

2. Lack of trust:** Many people may not be confident in the safety and reliability of cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms due to historical examples of fraud, cyberattacks, and loss of funds. This lack of trust may deter them from using these technologies.

3. Low education:** Many people may not have sufficient education about cryptocurrencies and blockchain to understand their potential benefits and opportunities. Lack of education can lead to an underestimation of these technologies and their potential.

4. Lack of use in everyday life:** For many people, cryptocurrencies and blockchain may remain abstractions because they do not encounter them in their daily lives. The lack of real-world use cases can lead to a failure to see concrete benefits.

5. High volatility and risks:** Cryptocurrencies are often associated with high volatility and financial risks. This can deter many people from investing in these assets or using them for transactions.

Widespread education, ease of use, and trust in crypto technologies are needed to increase understanding and acceptance of crypto technologies.

==========================================

1. Недостатнє розуміння технічних аспектів: Для багатьох людей концепції, які лежать в основі криптовалют і блокчейн-технологій, можуть бути складними і незрозумілими. Відсутність технічного розуміння може ускладнювати їхню здатність до використання криптовалют та блокчейн-платформ.

2. Відсутність довіри: Багато людей можуть бути не впевнені у безпеці та надійності криптовалют та блокчейн-платформ через історичні приклади шахрайства, кібератак та втрати коштів. Відсутність довіри може стримувати їх від використання цих технологій.

3. Низька освіченість: Багато людей можуть не мати достатньої освіти про криптовалюти та блокчейн, щоб зрозуміти їхню потенційну користь і можливості. Брак освіченості може призводити до недооцінювання цих технологій та їхнього потенціалу.

4. Відсутність використання у повсякденному житті: Для багатьох людей криптовалюти і блокчейн можуть залишатися абстракціями, оскільки вони не зустрічають їх у повсякденному житті. Відсутність реальних випадків використання може призводити до того, що вони не бачать конкретних переваг.

5. Висока волатильність та ризики: Криптовалюти часто пов'язані з високою волатильністю і фінансовими ризиками. Це може стримувати багатьох людей від вкладення коштів в ці активи або використання їх для проведення транзакцій.

Щоб поширити розуміння і прийняття криптотехнологій, потрібна широка освіта, спрощення використання та розвиток довіри в ці технології.

Most people may not see the whole picture of the meaning of crypto technology and not use it to its fullest potential for several reasons: https://ole-lukoye.blogspot.com/2024/04/people-may-not-see-whole-picture-of.html

Analytical Report: Understanding the Challenges Hindering Widespread Adoption of Crypto Technology

This report delves into the reasons why most people may not fully grasp the significance of cryptocurrency technology and fail to utilize its potential to the maximum:

1. Complexity of Technical Aspects: The intricate concepts behind cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies can pose a challenge for many individuals, impeding their ability to engage with these technologies effectively.

2. Lack of Trust: Past incidents of fraud, cyberattacks, and financial losses have instilled doubt in the safety and reliability of cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms, hindering widespread trust and adoption.

3. Limited Education: Insufficient knowledge and understanding of cryptocurrencies and blockchain among the general population may lead to underestimation of their benefits and opportunities.

4. Limited Integration into Daily Life: Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies often remain abstract concepts for many individuals due to the absence of tangible applications in their daily routines, leading to a lack of perceived utility.

5. High Volatility and Risks: The inherent volatility and financial risks associated with cryptocurrencies can deter individuals from investing or transacting with these assets.

Widespread education, enhanced usability, and improved trustworthiness of crypto technologies are essential for fostering greater understanding and acceptance among the general populace.

Keywords: Crypto Technology, Adoption Challenges, Technical Complexity, Trust, Education, Volatility, Usability.

Editorial Comment: Addressing the challenges outlined in this report is crucial for mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency technology. Education initiatives, user-friendly interfaces, and robust security measures are key to overcoming barriers and unlocking the full potential of crypto technologies.

Disclaimer: This report is based on preliminary investigation and may require further verification. Biases and inaccuracies may be present, and readers are encouraged to conduct independent research before forming conclusions.

Conclusion: To achieve widespread adoption, efforts must focus on simplifying complex concepts, building trust, and integrating crypto technologies into everyday life in a seamless and secure manner.

Links:

• Black_Roses
• InLeo
• NWL2024
• Спільнота OSINT Military / X
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO — РЕАЛЬНА ЗАМІНА ПРОПУТІНСЬКІЙ ПОМИЙЦІ
• BASTYON - соціальна мережа та відеохостінг на базі блокчейну Біткоїн

История Fediverse: Рассказ о свободной социальной сети - Peer Video Club https://peervideo.club/w/bZRoRRLT8hXnLK5DYiMVy2

Analytical Report: Historical Anbar near Maryina Roshcha casbt1osint.blogspot.com January 30, 2021 View Original 250 years ago, in 1771, the establishment was finally closed, the spirit of which caused consternation even among the most persistent residents of Moscow. Formally, the “anbar near Maryina Roshcha” was ordered to be demolished eight years earlier, after Empress Catherine II learned of its existence and was horrified. But only the attack that befell the country could change the order that had existed for centuries.

“They become hard as a rock.” The most terrible place in Moscow was described in the documents in a dull and indistinct manner. Thus, the decree about it was called “On the maintenance of an anbar near Maryina Grove for the burial of dead bodies.” But how could anyone in a Christian country be buried in a barn?

There was a little more information in the text of this Senate decree of May 22, 1744. It said that a member of the Main Police Chief's Office, Assessor Molchanov, submitted a report to the Senate “to fix the anbar on the wretched house, which is near Maryina Grove for burying dead bodies.” The police authorities, “due to the lack of money in the Police,” proposed to repair the barn at the expense of the Moscow province and the body that helped the Moscow bishop manage the diocese - the spiritual dicastery (in the same year, all dicasteries in the country were renamed into spiritual consistories). After discussing the matter, the senators ordered:

“For the burial of dead bodies, the anbar is now being built and will continue to be repaired by the Moscow Provincial Chancellery, from the unpaid income of that province.”

Such laconicism, uncharacteristic for that time, was explained quite simply. Our own people already understood everything, but outsiders didn’t need to know anything. That is why foreigners who came to Moscow and learned about such an amazing feature of Russian life could only speculate. Thus, Giles Fletcher, an envoy of the English Queen Elizabeth I, who arrived at the court of Tsar Fyodor Ioannovich on November 25, 1588, decided that the wretched house, which he called God’s house, owed its appearance to the fierce Russian winter:

“In winter, when everything is covered with snow and the ground freezes so much that it is impossible to use either a spade or a crowbar, they do not bury the dead, but place them (as many as die during the winter) in a house built in the suburbs or outside the city, which is called Bozhedom, or God's house: here the corpses are piled on top of each other, like firewood in the forest, and from the frost they become hard as stone; in the spring, when the ice has melted, everyone takes his dead person and confuses his body to the ground.”

Having visited Moscow twice, in 1576 and 1578, Daniel Prince von Buchau, the ambassador of the Holy Roman Emperor of the German Nation Maximilian II, compiled for his sovereign a description of Russian customs, in which the functions of the wretched house looked different:

“For the burial of the common people, they dig a large ditch and lay it in it, and if someone died without sacred rites, they do not throw away the earth at all, but after three or four months they build a house there, and the funeral is accompanied by great weeping and screaming over the dead from all the relatives who have gathered and neighbors, but are buried according to religious rites.

These ceremonies are performed three times annually.

Although the corpses of the dead give rise to the greatest stench, you can easily see that a large crowd of people flock to this kind of funeral; at the end of them, in order to forget their sadness, they indulge in drunkenness in a nearby tavern.”

However, in fact, the bodies of noble people also ended up in the wretched house. In addition, not all commoners ended their mortal journey in this way. The description given by von Buchau suffered from approximateness in some other details.

But even with regard to the awareness of our own people, the situation was little better. As it turned out in 1763, when Empress Catherine II became interested in the poor house, the knowledge of those who were directly responsible for it was neither deep nor accurate. In the Holy Governing Synod, and then in the Moscow Ecclesiastical Consistory, there were no documents describing the history of its appearance and specific rules of operation.

And the rector of the Vozdvizhenskaya Church, priest M. Andreev, who was in charge of a wretched house near Maryina Roshcha, was summoned to the consistory, and was able to provide only a few copies of relatively recent papers that he had inherited from his predecessors.

"The Soulless Remains of the Restless Dead" Little by little, domestic historians began to find out the origins of the wretched house. They agreed that the first mass and unorganized burials of beggars and other homeless people arose in ancient times. In ancient Rome, for example, the ditch where their bodies were thrown was called a fossa, but it did not last long. And the original name of such places in Rus' - “skudelnitsy”, was believed to have arisen in Judea, where those who came from distant places to worship in the Jerusalem Temple and who suddenly died were buried in a special skudelnichy field in pits from which clay had previously been extracted.

Skudelnitsy were mentioned in Russian chronicles as places where the dead were buried during epidemics and famine. It was claimed that in some cases the bodies of many people could have found their final resting place in one vast and deep hole. At the same time, different numbers were mentioned - 200–300 in Kholmogory, about 10 thousand in Novgorod, more than 40 thousand in Moscow.

However, the commemoration of the dead that existed after the burial of the poor was very similar to the funeral feasts of the pre-Christian era. Even greater rejection of the Orthodox clergy was caused by “Semik” - a common day of remembrance of all the dead that had taken root among the people. After all, they celebrated it in the groves that grew up around poor women, with curling birch branches, fortune telling and other pagan rituals.

Therefore, the church, as in the case of other ancient holidays beloved by its flock, began to gradually modify their essence. And the achievement of the goal was helped to a large extent by the beliefs that existed among the people since pagan times.

“In ancient Rus',” wrote the prominent ethnographer D.K. Zelenin, “the corpses of persons who died an unnatural death were not buried in the usual way in the ground, apparently in order to avoid desecration of the earth, and were not burned, but thrown out on the surface of the earth in desert places.

Spring frosts harmful to the growth of grain were attributed to the burial of such corpses in the ground.

Later, such corpses began to be thrown into damp, swampy places and rivers, and their burial in the cemetery was attributed to lack of rain and drought.”

The position of the hierarchy, as Zelenin pointed out, was exactly the opposite:

“Our hierarchs often punished the guilty children of the Church by depriving them of a church funeral and commemoration, just as the burial place was sometimes turned into an instrument of punishment or reward; but they always and everywhere recognized only one method of burial - through burying in the ground.”

The new type of burial that eventually emerged - placement in open pits or ditches, over which in some places a wooden structure was built for protection from bad weather, animals and birds, but in others not, looked like a concession by the church to the people or a compromise. But this impression was deceptive. After a certain time, those placed in such “wretched houses” were buried and covered with earth. Moreover, in Semik. So the pagan commemoration slowly and gradually turned into a Christian one.

In addition to this, not all those who suddenly died were sent to poor houses, the number of which was growing in the capital. No exceptions were made for the unidentified, but the bodies of the faithful children of the church, who regularly confessed, took communion and suddenly and unwillingly passed away from life, were spared a similar fate. However, this rule did not apply even to the highest-ranking believers, if at the time of their death they were in disgrace or died at the hands of the royal executioner.

Moreover, placement in a squalid house did not escape even some of the country's top officials.

“The body of Tsar Boris Godunov,” wrote about the events of 1605, corresponding member of the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences I. M. Snegirev, “buried with honor in the Archangel Cathedral, by order of Demetrius the Pretender, was taken out of the tomb, and not at the door, but through a hole deliberately punched in the wall of the Cathedral, it was thrown out.”

The new burial place of Tsar Boris was the Moscow Varsonofevsky Monastery, where at that time one of the poor houses was located. But the next year, 1606, they treated the body of the overthrown and murdered False Dmitry I even worse.

“The corpse of Dimitri the Pretender,” Snegirev narrated, “ulcerated, naked and cursed by the people, like the hated remains of a villain, was taken to the Poor House (where the Pokrovsky Monastery of the Pokrovsky is now); but the drays on which Otrepiev was lying did not pass through the gates of this house: in the spirit of that time, this was attributed to a miracle - the corpse was taken off the ditch and dragged into a pit.”

However, the funeral service and burial of the imaginary Dmitry Ioannovich, even in a wretched house, never happened:

“During the stay of Otrepyev’s body at the Poor House, as the chronicler of that time testifies, various wonderful and terrible ghosts were seen above him, screams and howls were heard; His corpse seemed to appear either a mile away in front of the Wretched House or close to it; To this end, deep snow fell, cold set in, and terrible whirlwinds raged (this was in May 1606). From which they then concluded that the earth does not accept the Pretender - and they transported the soulless remains of the restless dead man to the Serpukhov road and in the town of Kotlah they burned him and scattered the ashes in the air.”

“On Semitic Thursday I attended a divine service “On Semitic Thursday I attended a divine service "With the Tsar, Queen and Patriarch" After the accession of the Romanovs, the use of poor houses continued according to the established tradition, and the changes made did not change its essence. Thus, in 1619, the father and co-ruler of the first tsar of the dynasty, Mikhail Fedorovich, Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Philaret, clarified the rules that should guide the clergy when determining whether or not to send the body of a suddenly deceased person to a poor home. If, for example, a person drowned while swimming, then it was necessary. But if you didn’t swim out, having fallen into the water against your will, then no. The remains of the one who was killed by falling from a swing awaited months of detention in an unfilled hole. At the same time, those who were stabbed to death in a fight, as well as those who choked to death on food, were subject to an ordinary Christian burial.

The number of days a year on which funeral services took place and bodies were buried in poor houses also changed. At some periods there were two or three of them. But always and invariably, the main day for closing pits and ditches remained Semik - Thursday in the seventh week after Easter.

At the same time, the location of poor houses changed not often, but regularly. In Moscow, for example, land was allocated for them on the outskirts or uninhabited places where they built a temple, at some distance from it they dug the first hole and built a watchman’s guardhouse, called the house of God.

“Unfortunately born babies” were thrown to this gatehouse, whose birth threatened their parents with accusations of fornication.

Childless families took them from there. And for many decades the same picture was observed in the capital. Bozhedom carried a large basket with children sitting and lying in it through the streets and asked for alms to feed them. They claimed that the phrase in his recitative: “Or maybe they are yours!” acted flawlessly on representatives of all classes.

However, Semik brought the main income to both the godly and the clergy of the church at the wretched house. Muscovites, who were moved during the mournful ceremony - after all, any of them could get into the pit - generously threw food and coins onto the mound that appeared on the site of the pit. They, without any hesitation, participated in digging out the next place where the bodies were deposited. And they fervently prayed for the repose of the souls of the dead, not skimping on candles or alms for the orphans of God and the numerous beggars.

In addition, the relatives of suicides, after bringing the body to a squalid house, had to pay considerable “funeral” fees - hryvnia.

Meanwhile, Moscow was growing, and new courtyards were moving closer and closer to the wretched house. Then either the space for new pits and ditches ran out, or the patience of the surrounding residents, who were no longer able to endure the stinking spirit, ran out. And the wretched house was moved to a new outlying or empty place.

Over the years, the composition of those who participated in the funeral service and burial of those who died without repentance in Semik also changed. Thus, in the description of the stay of Patriarch Macarius III of Antioch in Russia in 1654–1656 there is an interesting detail about Moscow:

“The inhabitants of this city have a custom on this day, Thursday after Pentecost, to go out of town with the king, queen and patriarch to distribute alms and perform services and memorials for all the dead, drowned in water, killed, as well as for dead strangers, with full joy and fun; all the merchants of the city and markets are moving their trade outside the city.”

Whether Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich visited there regularly or just wanted to demonstrate to the foreign hierarch his piety and the people’s love for themselves did not matter much. The participation of the first person in a mournful ceremony, like any other, had the same consequences as usual.

All the rich and noble who sought his favor began to bend over backwards to show their zeal, while transgressing all reasonable boundaries.

And following their example, the rest did the same. Thus, holes in poor houses are no longer simply covered with earth.

“On Semitic Thursday,” wrote I. M. Snegirev, “on the seventh week after Easter, there was a religious procession from the nearest monastery or cathedral to the Divine House (poor house) and people flocked with coffins, clothes and shrouds for the dead; The pious themselves, out of zeal, dismantled the bodies with their bare hands, mostly wrapped in matting, and out of Christian charity, not disdaining the disgusting look and smell of the corpses that had been lying for a long time in the pit of the barn, “hidden” them, put white shirts and shrouds on them, then laid them into coffins, lowered into holes prepared for this purpose and buried.”

"Those thieves and robbers "Those thieves and robbers “Put in the field on new pits” The turning point in the history of poor houses came after the Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Adrian approved the “Instructions for priestly elders” on December 22, 1697. In accordance with this document, the bodies of only captured thieves and robbers who, before dying from illness or wounds or before execution, confessed and the priest allowed them to receive communion, were necessarily sent into pits and ditches. That is why the archers, who rebelled in 1698, ended up in the pits of those cities where their cases were being investigated and where, after the verdict, they were handed over to the master craftsmen.

Those unrepentant before passing away or killed during the capture of thieves and robbers, as well as all those who were considered guilty of their own death, the instructions prescribed to be “laid in the forest or in the field, except in cemeteries and wretched houses.” Moreover, determining the degree of guilt of the deceased in his own death was entrusted to the priests, from whom the instructions required “to thoroughly search about those people,” that is, to find out everything absolutely precisely.

However, what was called the “delicacy of the priests” was no secret to anyone, and in the same instructions the priesthood was urged not to take money from those who would “beat the deceased with their foreheads.” So, if the suicide was not demonstratively obvious or the blame for the accidental death could be blamed on some circumstances, the relatives of the deceased and the clergy agreed to mutual satisfaction on the funeral service and burial at the church or in the monastery cemetery.

As a result, over the years, poor houses turned into a kind of morgue, albeit with a temperature that differed little from the ambient temperature. They were primarily used to transport those executed and those who died in custody and unidentified corpses from the streets.

The similarity with morgues was added by the fact that Peter I ordered the bodies anatomized in hospitals to be sent to the pits.

“Anbars” over pits, and in some cities they were made of stone and locked, became an indispensable attribute of poor houses. But this did not stop thieves and robbers from using them to their advantage. They broke the locks and threw the people they robbed and killed into the pit. After all, an accurate count of bodies was never kept there.

By the end of the reign of the reformer tsar, against the backdrop of his policy of Europeanization, the squalid houses smelled not only of decay, but also of medieval savagery. However, the desire to change something appeared only in his royal niece, Anna Ioannovna. According to historians, in 1730, on the eve of the coronation in the Mother See, she wanted to abolish the last of the wretched houses remaining in Moscow. But in reality, in 1732, it was limited to moving it away from the Kremlin - to Maryina Roshcha.

The decree of the Moscow Dicastery to the rector of the Vozdvizhenskaya Church dated November 16, 1732 said:

“The newly defined hangar, which was moved from the site of the Church of the Exaltation of the Exaltation, and placed in the field on new pits for the cemetery of human dead wretched bodies, to know and watch, and to hold the key to the hangar and to put human dead bodies sent from various orders into the hangar and throughout the summer on Thursday the seventh weeks of Passover are for the burial of dead bodies and the commemoration of repairing your butt.”

But the clergy of the Vozdvizhenskaya Church could only dream of sole disposal of the income from commemorations in the Semik clergy. On this day, monks from different monasteries came to the poor house to collect donations, and the clergy of the surrounding churches also tried to get something. And a little later, the beginning of the mournful ceremony was a religious procession from the Assumption Cathedral in the Kremlin to Maryina Roshcha, in which many prominent Moscow church figures of that time participated. And this attracted even more believers and donors to the commemorations in the wretched house.

“Bury the earth and level it immediately” It would seem that Empress Elizaveta Petrovna, who could not stand odors, especially cadaverous ones, could put an end to the history of wretched houses. For example, while in Moscow, on July 2, 1848, she signed a decree prohibiting burials near all churches on the way from the Kremlin Assumption Cathedral to her palace on the Yauza: “It is very indecent and dangerous to bury dead bodies here.” The decree, in addition, ordered that all the crypts where there were unburied coffins be filled with earth, from which a spirit emanated, although incomparable with a wretched house, but quite strong.

“The consistory,” wrote church historian N.P. Rozanov, “on August 2, 1748, ordered the parish clergy along the main streets from the Kremlin to the palace on the Yauza ... not to bury the dead; level the old graves; and use tombstones from graves for church buildings as needed. Until the time of construction of a special cemetery, other nearby churches are indicated for the burial of the bodies of the dead in the parishes of churches in which burials are prohibited. However, after the Empress’s departure from Moscow, the Consistory began to allow the burial of the dead in those churches where it was prohibited.”

Given the way things were going, taking on the task of liquidating a wretched house meant wasting time. Empress Catherine II fully realized this truth. Unlike her predecessors on the throne, she, considering herself an enlightened ruler, did not want to put up with the existence of the Yamniki in her state. There is a version that she personally visited Maryina Roshcha and was horrified. And the main user of the wretched house, the police authorities, called to account by her, immediately appealed to the Holy Governing Synod, indicating:

“The spring time is coming, in which the air may be thin and contagious from those dead bodies.”

And on April 18, 1763, the Synod ordered all dead bodies “to be buried and leveled immediately after the usual funeral chanting....”

“From now on,” said the decree of the Synod, “bodies brought from various public places, after the departure of the funeral, will be buried at the same time on the kosht (with funds - “History” ) of the places from which they will be brought.”

At the same time, the religious procession to Maryina Roshcha was also prohibited. The activity of the poor houses was completed. And not only in Moscow - the decree of the Synod was sent to all dioceses. But it was carried out no better than Elizabeth Petrovna’s decree on burials at churches.

Almost eight years later, on March 15, 1771, the Moscow Office of the Synod reminded the Moscow Spiritual Consistory that the decree on the liquidation of the wretched house and the prohibition of religious processions to it should still be carried out. However, the last point in the history of burials in pits and ditches was helped by a disaster - the plague epidemic.

Fear of a growing pestilence forced the authorities to act as harshly as possible. On October 15, 1771, it was strictly ordered that all the dead be buried without delay, and violators faced the most severe punishment. Later, a decree appeared on funerals only and exclusively in cemeteries, and priests who violated it were immediately transferred to the poorest parish in the diocese. There were no people willing to disobey among the clergy who were seriously frightened by such a prospect.

The last time the authorities remembered the wretched house was in 1812, after Napoleon’s army left Moscow.

In the Mother See there remained many corpses of enemy soldiers who died from wounds and diseases. And they, as Moscow old-timers claimed, were burned in Maryina Roshcha, where there used to be pit pits.

What about Semik? It continued to be celebrated many decades later, but not at all in the same way as before.

“The modern Moscow Semik,” wrote the historian and publicist S.P. Korablev in 1855, “does not differ strikingly from other Moscow festivities... Crews with dandies and dandies, modest droshky and crowds of pedestrians rush together to Maryina Grove for the sake of Semik. At the entrance to the grove, first of all, there is a tavern with a garden for outdoor tea drinking and a music choir; it is followed by various folk amusements: swings, comedies and round dances.”

The ancient holiday, as intended, has changed completely:

“Divination with wreaths and curling them also seems to have disappeared in the ancient capital... With the destruction of the poor women, the commemoration of them was also destroyed, being replaced by the institution of the Church to remember all the fathers and brothers who had previously departed.”

Evgeny Zhirnov

Murchandiser в X: «Galactic Jew 🇮🇱: "#неродина вот вам сцуко и вик…" - https://t.co/KEAt1RA87Z https://t.co/bO1iMvPxGI» / X https://twitter.com/Lviv_Metro/status/1775408319869427761

Litecoin, often termed as the "silver" to Bitcoin's "gold," remains a stalwart in the cryptocurrency landscape. Created in 2011 by Charlie Lee, a former Google employee, Litecoin boasts a faster blockchain and lower block rewards compared to its counterpart. Amidst market turbulence, LTC continues to captivate investors, maintaining a robust price and market capitalization.

In this report, we delve into a forecast for Litecoin spanning from 2024 into the distant future, exploring potential price trajectories, market trends, and expert insights. However, it's imperative to exercise caution as this investigation was conducted swiftly and warrants thorough verification. Biases, potential misinformation, and external influences, including those of Russian special services, may skew perceptions.

Key Takeaways:

• Current LTC/USD rate stands at $102.68 (as of 04/03/2024).
• LTC chart indicates consolidation, with a trading corridor between $55-$80.
• Wide trading range projected for 2024-2025: $40-$115.
• Expert forecasts for 2024 LTC/USD range from $25 to $242.81.
• Despite its connection to Bitcoin, short-term Litecoin predictions are cautious, with potential for speculative gains amidst volatility.
• Technical analysis suggests a double zigzag pattern forming, indicating potential price movements.

Expert Forecasts:

• Binance analysts foresee moderate growth for Litecoin by the end of 2024, with a projected price around $63.9.

Editorial Comment: While Litecoin's resilience and potential are evident, investors must navigate uncertainties and verify information diligently. The cryptocurrency landscape is rife with complexities, and factors such as geopolitical tensions and market sentiment can significantly influence price movements. As such, it's advisable to approach Litecoin investment with a discerning eye and a commitment to thorough research.

Disclaimer: This report is based on preliminary investigations and may contain inaccuracies or biases. Readers are urged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making financial decisions. References to unverified sources are provided for informational purposes only.

Conclusion: Litecoin's future trajectory remains a subject of speculation and analysis. While short-term forecasts suggest cautious optimism, long-term prospects hinge on various factors, including technological developments and market dynamics. As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, staying informed and vigilant is paramount for investors seeking to navigate the terrain successfully.

Keywords: Litecoin, cryptocurrency, forecast, analysis, Bitcoin, market trends, volatility, expert opinions.

Links:

• InLeo
• NWL2024
• Спільнота OSINT Military / X
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO — РЕАЛЬНА ЗАМІНА ПРОПУТІНСЬКІЙ ПОМИЙЦІ
• BASTYON - соціальна мережа та відеохостінг на базі блокчейну Біткоїн

Editorial Comment: Cryptocurrency forecasts are subject to volatility and external influences, necessitating caution and diligence in decision-making.

ecency.com3 min View Original Annotation: This analytical report examines recent events in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, focusing on military actions, losses, and strategic maneuvers. Through a detailed analysis of reported incidents and statements from official sources, the report aims to provide insights into the current state of the conflict and potential future scenarios.

Hashtags: #RussiaUkraineConflict #MilitaryActions #Losses #StrategicManeuvers #DefenseMinisterStatement #GeopoliticalAnalysis #MilitaryTechnology #SecurityThreats #ConflictResolution #InternationalRelations

Conclusion: The events described in the report highlight the intensification of hostilities in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, with significant military actions reported on various fronts. The conflicting accounts of losses underscore the complexity of information warfare in the digital age and the challenges of verifying battlefield developments. As the situation continues to evolve, it is essential to monitor developments closely and consider the implications for regional stability and international security.

Keywords: Russia-Ukraine conflict, military operations, casualties, strategic analysis, defense ministry statement, information warfare, geopolitical tensions, security implications, conflict resolution

Links: ole-lukoye.blogspot.com

The Russian Armed Forces “cleaned up” and at the same time razed the Belgorod village of Kozinka, and a UAV raid on the airfield in Engels. … ole-lukoye.blogspot.com March 30, 2023 View Original During the shelling of Grayvoron , the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs was damaged, and the head of the migration department, police major Alexander Uvarov, was wounded, ASTRA sources report .

In the Kursk region , according to the Mash Telegram channel, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked the Kurchatov Nuclear Power Plant. According to the channel, five kamikaze drones and an S-200 missile were shot down while approaching the facility. Debris damaged the Vysoka substation .

Radio Liberty notes that 500 meters from this substation is the permanent deployment point of the 16th separate electronic warfare brigade of the Russian Armed Forces, whose military personnel participated in the invasion of Ukraine. Another video of night explosions was geolocated in the area of ​​the Aviaavtomatika plant , a manufacturer of instruments and equipment for airplanes and helicopters.

Several drones were shot down at night over Engels , said the governor of the Saratov region, Roman Busargin. ASTRA sources claim that three of the four attacking UAVs fell on the territory of the military strategic aviation airfield in Engels . There were no injuries and no damage was reported. RBC-Ukraine, citing sources in the special services, reports that the attack was organized by the Main Intelligence Directorate .

Losses During voting in the presidential election, Russian air defense forces shot down 419 drones and 67 missiles, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said .

He also reported on the successful suppression of attempts by Ukrainian DRGs to seize settlements in the Belgorod and Kursk regions:

“At the same time, the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the direction of action of the groups covering the state border during eight days of combat operations amounted to more than 3.5 thousand, or more precisely 3,501 people, of which 790 were irretrievable losses. 23 tanks, 34 armored vehicles, including 11 Bradleys, five Vampire multiple launch rocket system launchers, and an Mi-8 helicopter were destroyed.” An analyst under the nickname Naalsio writes that it was possible to confirm the loss of only seven pieces of equipment by the Ukrainian side: two tanks, two infantry fighting vehicles, a BAT-2 track-laying vehicle, a radar station and a Mi-24 helicopter. As the analyst notes , many images of alleged Ukrainian losses published by Russian sources show equipment without traces of damage, moreover, located in areas controlled by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, so these losses cannot be considered confirmed. Confirmed Russian losses during the same period amounted to 4 pieces of equipment, of which only one BMP-1 was completely destroyed.

A video of a Russian military inspecting an M1A1 Abrams tank, which was allegedly lost by the Ukrainian Armed Forces near Avdeevka , is being circulated on social networks

Title: Dynamics of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict: Analysis and Predictions

Annotation: This analytical report scrutinizes recent developments in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, delving into military engagements, casualties, and strategic maneuvers. By meticulously analyzing reported incidents and official statements, the report aims to offer insights into the current status of the conflict and potential future trajectories.

Keywords: Russia-Ukraine conflict, military engagements, casualties, strategic analysis, defense ministry statement, information warfare, geopolitical tensions, security implications, conflict resolution

Rewrite: This report provides a comprehensive analysis of recent events in the enduring conflict between Russia and Ukraine, focusing on military engagements, casualties, and strategic moves. Through an in-depth examination of reported incidents and official declarations, the report endeavors to shed light on the present state of the conflict and its potential future courses.

Hashtags: #RussiaUkraineConflict #MilitaryEngagements #Casualties #StrategicMoves #DefenseMinistryStatement #GeopoliticalAnalysis #InformationWarfare #SecurityImplications #ConflictResolution

Editorial Comment: The detailed examination of recent incidents underscores the escalating tensions within the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, emphasizing the intricate dynamics at play and the challenges of verifying information amidst a digital battlefield.

Disclaimer: While informative, this report necessitates rigorous verification due to potential biases and the evolving nature of the conflict. Readers are urged to exercise caution and critical analysis when interpreting the findings presented herein.

Conclusion: The documented events reflect a heightened intensity in hostilities within the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, marked by significant military actions and conflicting reports of losses. As the situation evolves, continued vigilance and analysis are imperative to gauge its impact on regional stability and global security.

Links: ole-lukoye.blogspot.com

Additional Links:

• InLeo - Profile
• NWL2024
• OSINT Military / X on Twitter
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative Reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO - Social Media Platform
• War In Ukraine Community
• Team Ukraine on Hive

https://imgur.com/ztZQgid

#Russia suffered in #Ukraine.

Highlights: +710 Personnel +20 Tanks +17 APVs +32 Artillery +1 Anti-aircraft Systems +26 UAVs +35 Other Vehicles +3 Special Equipment

Imgur: The magic of the Internet https://imgur.com/F8lOBxZ

Statistics: reddit.com/r/RussianLosses/com

#RussianLosses

А что случилось? Главное за 31 марта по версии SOTAvision:

Открытое письмо журналистов и правозащитников в поддержку Антонины Фаворской собрало (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28698) уже более 260 подписей. Спасибо всем, кто поддерживает и распространяет!

Акция жен мобилизованных и «беседа» в ОВД с нашей журналисткой Анной Слива

Жены мобилизованных вышли (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28702) с пикетом к зданию Министерства обороны, к ним подошли (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28705) силовики. Активистки Мария и Паулина рассказали о том, как они восприняли (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28706) прошедшие выборы президента;

Акцию жен мобилизованных снимала наша корреспондентка Анна Слива. Полиция увезла (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28707) ее в ОВД «Хамовники» «побеседовать». Встречать ее из ОВД приехали (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28709) жены мобилизованных. В итоге Анну Слива отпустили (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28710) по статье о «нарушении установленного порядка организации либо проведения собрания, митинга, демонстрации, шествия или пикетирования».

Другие новости

Москвичку оштрафовали (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28708) на 10 тысяч рублей за съемку на акции памяти Навального.

Студента МГУ отчислили (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28711) за «экстремистское» название «вай-фая».

Смотрите итоги недели с Игорем Яковенко и Михаилом Саввой на нашем канале! (https://youtube.com/live/AApdQNbp1Bo?feature=share)

Ознакомьтесь с обращением представителей российских независимых редакций и правозащитных организаций в поддержку нашей журналистки Антонины Фаворской! (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28661)

Подписывайтесь на группу поддержки Антонины Фаворской! (https://t.me/freefavorskaya)

Помогите участием в сборе на передачи в СИЗО Антонине Фаворской! (https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28659)

На фото — корреспондентка SOTAvision Анна Слива.

https://t.me/sotavisionmedia/28713

Annotation: This report delves into the recent surge in drone production in Russia, particularly focusing on the production rate of black Shahed drones and its potential implications for regional dynamics.

Keywords: Drone production, Russia, Shahed drones, military technology, defense industry

Rewrite: This report provides insights into the significant increase in drone production observed in Russia, with a particular emphasis on the production rate of black Shahed drones and its strategic significance.

Hashtags: #DroneProduction #Russia #ShahedDrones #MilitaryTechnology #DefenseIndustry

Editorial Comment: The rapid expansion of drone production underscores Russia's growing emphasis on unmanned aerial vehicles as a crucial component of its military strategy, warranting close monitoring of its implications for regional security.

Disclaimer: While informative, this report necessitates thorough verification due to potential biases and incomplete information. Readers are encouraged to exercise critical judgment when interpreting the findings presented here.

Conclusion: The surge in drone production, especially of black Shahed drones, highlights Russia's increasing reliance on unmanned aerial vehicles for military operations, raising questions about its strategic objectives and regional impact.

Keywords: Drone production, military strategy, regional security, unmanned aerial vehicles

Links:

• InLeo - Profile
• News Week Life 2024
• OSINT Military / X on Twitter
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative Reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO - Social Media Platform
• War In Ukraine Community
• Team Ukraine on Hive

March 26, 2024 The Insider

---

The Ministry of Energy has proposed to recognize mining as an industry, Izvestia reports. There is now an active discussion of this idea.

The Ministry of Economic Development has supported the initiative, while the Ministry of Industry and Trade, which deals with the classification of OKVED, said that first it is necessary to adopt a law on mining and then discuss the recognition of mining as an industry. The deputy head of the specialized committee of the State Duma said that the decision should be made in the next few weeks.

Market participants believe that this will help the development of the industry and improve taxation.

Cryptocurrency helps Russia circumvent European sanctions. Many Russian banks are under sanctions and cannot send SWIFT transfers from Russia to other countries, and vice versa. Cryptocurrency helps both ordinary Russians to withdraw their paychecks from Russia, and people who are under personal sanctions - to bypass international bans, wrote the project "Dossier".

In addition, mining farms generate profits, part of which the state can count on collecting taxes from it. On July 14, 2022, Vladimir Putin signed a law that explicitly prohibits the use of digital financial assets (DFAs) and utilitarian digital rights (UCRs) as a means of payment in Russia.

https://theins.ru/news/270265

Title: Proposal to Recognize Mining as an Industry Gains Traction in Russia

Annotation: This report discusses the Ministry of Energy's proposal to classify mining as an industry in Russia, highlighting its potential implications for the country's economy and regulatory framework.

Keywords: Mining industry, Russia, Ministry of Energy, OKVED classification, taxation, cryptocurrency, sanctions

Rewrite: This report explores the Ministry of Energy's initiative to designate mining as an official industry in Russia, examining its impact on economic development, regulatory standards, and taxation policies.

Hashtags: #MiningIndustry #Russia #MinistryOfEnergy #OKVEDClassification #Cryptocurrency #Sanctions

Editorial Comment: The consideration of mining as an industry reflects Russia's evolving approach to economic diversification and regulatory adaptation amid global trends in cryptocurrency and sanctions.

Disclaimer: While informative, this report requires thorough verification due to potential biases and incomplete information. Readers are advised to exercise critical judgment when interpreting the findings presented here.

Conclusion: The potential recognition of mining as an industry signals a significant shift in Russia's economic landscape, with implications for taxation, regulatory oversight, and the utilization of cryptocurrencies in circumventing international sanctions.

Keywords: Mining industry, economic development, regulatory standards, taxation policies, cryptocurrency

Links:

• The Insider - Proposal to Recognize Mining
• InLeo - Profile
• News Week Life 2024
• OSINT Military / X on Twitter
• Element [4] | News Week Life | Geo & War
• Alternative Reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO - Social Media Platform
• War In Ukraine Community
• Team Ukraine on Hive

Putin was mentally normal 20 years ago. He was a KGB officer, he had already shown that he did not value human lives, he already had the blood of the children of Beslan on him. But he was mentally normal.

He didn't say maniacal nonsense about the fact that Lenin invented Ukraine when he was creating the USSR. He did not wave some letters of Rurik and maps, on which there is no Ukraine. He was quite aware of reality.

This proves that Putin then went mad at some point. Not figuratively, but in a purely medical sense. Russia is ruled by a deranged maniac who, for his own delusional purposes, unleashes wars and kills hundreds of thousands of people.

These are not just words of Boris Nemtsov. This is a real diagnosis. Necessary to understand what fate awaits the country, absolute power in which belongs to a madman.

Title: Unraveling Putin's Descent: From Sanity to Madness

Annotation: This analytical report delves into the transformation of Vladimir Putin's mental state over the past two decades, highlighting the shift from rationality to madness and its implications for Russia and its neighboring states.

Keywords: Putin, mental health, Russia, madness, independent countries, war, Boris Nemtsov

Rewrite: In a compelling analysis, this report explores the alarming transition in Vladimir Putin's mental state over the last twenty years, shedding light on his descent from rationality to madness and its profound repercussions for Russia and neighboring nations.

Hashtags: #PutinMadness #Russia #MentalHealth #BorisNemtsov #War

Editorial Comment: The assessment presented here offers a sobering perspective on the psychological trajectory of Putin's leadership, urging careful consideration of its implications for regional stability and international relations.

Disclaimer: This investigation, though insightful, necessitates thorough verification due to potential biases and incomplete information. Reader discretion is advised.

Conclusion: As Putin's grip on power remains firm, understanding the complexities of his mental state becomes paramount in predicting the future trajectory of Russia and its role in global affairs.

Keywords: Putin, mental health, Russia, Boris Nemtsov, leadership, international relations

Links:

• War In Ukraine Community
• Team Ukraine on Hive
• BASTYON - Social Media Platform

Qoto Mastodon https://qoto.org/web/statuses/112191698543487818

Video: SOTAvision

(3) CASBT OSINT (aka Пухнастіум Rex на 25%) в X: «Момент разговора силовиков с Паулиной Сафроновой Видео: SOTAvision https://t.co/wkgTt6cdqb» / X https://twitter.com/CASBT_OSINT_UA_/status/1774497761661997205

WHY DIDN'T THE GERMANS OVERTHROW LENIN RIGHT AWAY? Asked me.

1. The question of removing the Bolsheviks from power, immediately after their fulfillment of the task of the Kaiser's General Staff and German intelligence, prompted to the Germans by Parvus - a prominent German Social Democrat of Russian origin, who later became an agent of the Kaiser, was discussed in Berlin in complete seriousness.
2. Having concluded a separate peace of such a scale of betrayal and humiliation (the "genius" for Zurbarevich-Putin's "Brest Peace") that even "brothers in the revolution" like the SRs recoiled from them, Bolshevism surrendered the country to the Germans, and had to be resigned. Since the Bolsheviks were held solely on German bayonets, and literally and simply by the "favor" of millions of German units standing near St. Petersburg, it was a purely technical question. 3- The Germans themselves were shocked by Lenin's betrayal. As well as the humanity and stupidity of Kerensky towards him. They began to look for a political force with which they could preserve the Brest Peace. For they did not care about the Bolsheviks themselves, of course. 4- They went through absolutely all the options, they re-proposed all the possibilities to all the possible parties. None of them agreed to go for the heinous betrayal of the Motherland.
3. Then the Germans bet at least on weakening the influence of the Bolsheviks. Not caring at all about the good of Ukraine or Latvia, they actively began to support the separatist forces there. Moreover, even in Estonia the supporters of secession from Russia among the local nationalists were in a complete minority.
4. As elsewhere, nationalists wanted only broad autonomy, but within Russia after the Constituent Assembly, elections to which took place on the territory of all regions of the then Russia. As all regions recognized its legitimacy.
5. In Transcaucasia, the socialists (not Bolsheviks) who won the Constituent Assembly simply ruled. Having confirmed the de facto independence of their countries. Why were occupied by the Entente countries, who feared the abolition of Russian victories on the Caucasian front.
6. Having thus weakened the influence of the Bolsheviks, the Germans took care to preserve their power to save the Separate Peace: without the network of 350 German commandant's offices that performed the function of preserving the power of the Bolshevik putschists, the Bolsheviks would have been swept away.
7. Having invented hundreds of thousands of "Latvian riflemen" to cover up the participation of the German army in supporting the usurpers (which would have been more than all the Latvians conscripted at that time), the Bolsheviks still carefully conceal this fact.
8. However, even they could not cover their tracks - the fact of participation of thousands of German soldiers in the suppression of Savinkov's uprising in Yaroslavl (!) - outside the "Brest Peace" zone - the uprising against Lenin's dictatorship - could not be silenced even by the Soviet propaganda. It was on such commandant's offices that they held on. And without them they would have collapsed already in the summer of 1918.
9. Having strengthened by the fall of 1918, the Bolsheviks spread their subversive work to Europe, to the country that fed them, the Germans. They prepare an armed putsch in Berlin and Kiel.
10. The German army, fortunately for this country, was not decomposed and destroyed, as in Russia. The Germans themselves had already seen the terror and perfidy of the Bolsheviks: the uprisings of the Reds in the Reich were quickly crushed by military force.
11. The leaders of Kaiser Germany themselves renounce about the same time publicly all support for the Bolsheviks.
12. "At the end of October 1918, the German Foreign Ministry for the first time favored breaking relations with the Bolsheviks. The memorandum...declared: "We, who have spoiled our reputation by inventing Bolshevism and letting it loose on the world to the detriment of Russia, must now, ... not lend a helping hand to it, lest we lose Russia's confidence in the future." (Zubov,p. 531.)
13. As we, the liberals of Russia, honest people, the White Guards, had warned, the Bolsheviks occupied all the "independent countries," establishing there the most brutal regime of national genocide (as in Russia itself - against all its peoples).
14. Moreover, although having prevented the Bolsheviks from seizing power, their creators in the General Staff of the German Kaiser were horrified to see the demise of Kaiser Germany itself: Wilhelm the Second himself was forced to abdicate.
15. In the weak Weimar Republic, which was established after him, another Bolshevik party quickly gained power - a party of the same radical socialists, but not of the international, but of the national type. Briefly, the National Socialists of Germany called their party "the party of the Nazis".
16. Hitler openly admired the system of concentration camps established by Lenin: back in the 1920s he wrote: "these concentration camps of the Bolsheviks we will use for the destruction of anti-people elements.
17. Mutual friendship and support between Germany and the Bolsheviks blossomed after the treaties at Rappalo in the early 1920s, with secret protocols creating a German army forbidden by Versailles.

18. Cooperation between the two fraternal socialist parties reached its climax with the Molotov-Ribentropp Pact, the main reason for the outbreak of World War II.
    That's how out of the attempt to save Germany through the separatist peace with the Traitors of the Motherland, the world cataclysms of global scales came out.

Qoto Mastodon https://qoto.org/web/statuses/112191461160814418

Bertolt Brecht Quotes About War

• The Führer will tell you that the war will last only four weeks. By early fall, you'll all be home. But the fall will come and go many times, and you won't come home. The painter will tell you that the machines will fight for you, only a few will die. But hundreds of thousands of you will die. Dying in such huge numbers that no one has ever died before in the world.

• When the leaders speak of peace, the common people know war is coming. When the leaders curse war, the mobilization order has already been issued.

• You know you can do barbarian things to barbarians. It is this very desire to do barbaric things that makes governments call their enemies barbarians.

• There will be wars as long as one man can make a living out of them.

• You always meet people who say, "Someday war will end." And I'll tell you, nowhere does it say that war will ever end. Of course, there may be a little break. The war may need to take a breather or it may even get unlucky, so to speak. It is not immune to that, for nothing is perfect in this world. Probably there will never be a perfect war, the kind of war that you can say you can't stick to, either. You see, because of something unforeseen it will suddenly come to a standstill, because man cannot take everything into account. Say, some oversight, and all the music is ruined. Then you have to pull the war out of the shit it's in! But the emperors, kings and the pope will come to her rescue, they won't leave her in the lurch. So, all in all, no serious dangers threaten her and she has a long life ahead of her.

---

He hated war and everything connected with it. Even in school essays he allowed himself very sharp attacks in the direction of the "military" (as he liked to say). During the war years because of kidney disease Brecht was sent to the hospital in Augsburg as an orderly. Looking at the wounded soldiers he developed a strong aversion not only to the war, but to the entire social order of Germany. During this period he wrote his famous poem "The Legend of the Dead Soldier". In the plot of which, a nameless soldier, tired of war, dies. However, his death was not in the plans of the military commanders. The medical commission recognized the soldier fit for service, he was taken out of the grave and returned to the ranks.

Analytical Report: Bertolt Brecht's Perspectives on War

Bertolt Brecht, the renowned playwright and poet, offers profound insights into the nature of war through his poignant quotes and personal experiences. His reflections underscore the grim realities and contradictions inherent in armed conflicts, shedding light on the deceptive narratives propagated by leaders and the profound human suffering caused by war.

Brecht's quotes serve as a stark reminder of the deceitful promises made by leaders to justify war. He highlights how leaders, like the Führer in World War II, manipulate the masses with false assurances of a swift and victorious conflict, only for the war to drag on endlessly, claiming countless lives.

Moreover, Brecht exposes the hypocrisy of leaders who preach peace while secretly preparing for war. He emphasizes how the common people sense the impending conflict long before it is officially declared, illustrating the disconnect between political rhetoric and reality.

In his critiques, Brecht delves into the dehumanizing nature of war, where barbarity begets barbarity. He warns against the dehumanization of the enemy, orchestrated by governments to justify acts of violence and atrocities.

Through his writings, Brecht also reflects on the economic and political interests driving conflicts, suggesting that wars persist as long as they remain profitable for a select few. He challenges the notion of war ever truly ending, suggesting that it may only pause temporarily or mutate into new forms, perpetuating the cycle of violence.

Brecht's personal experiences during World War II further shaped his anti-war sentiments. Witnessing the suffering of wounded soldiers and the callousness of military bureaucracy intensified his aversion to war and the prevailing social order.

In conclusion, Bertolt Brecht's insights on war offer a sobering critique of its underlying causes, human toll, and enduring legacy. His words resonate with timeless relevance, urging us to confront the harsh realities of conflict and strive for a more peaceful world.

Keywords: Bertolt Brecht, war, conflict, leadership, propaganda, human suffering, anti-war sentiment

Links: Link to Bertolt Brecht's Quotes

Editorial Comment: Bertolt Brecht's reflections on war provide valuable perspectives that resonate deeply in today's world, where armed conflicts continue to ravage communities and destabilize regions. His words serve as a poignant reminder of the urgent need for diplomacy, empathy, and collective action to prevent the horrors of war.

Qoto Mastodon https://qoto.org/web/statuses/112191069217109914

Abstract: This report delves into the pivotal coups and revolutions that have shaped the trajectory of Russian history since the era of Ivan the Terrible. From the Time of Troubles to the annexation of Crimea, these events have left an indelible mark on Russia's political and social landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis, this report sheds light on the violent upheavals that have defined Russia's historical narrative.

Keywords: Russian History, Coups, Revolutions, Political Upheavals, Consequences.

Editorial Comment: The tumultuous history of Russia is punctuated by a series of coups and revolutions, each leaving a lasting impact on the nation's destiny. This report offers valuable insights into the turbulent forces that have shaped Russia's evolution and underscores the importance of understanding historical context in contemporary analysis.

Disclaimer: This investigation was conducted under time constraints and warrants thorough verification. The accounts presented herein may be subject to bias and manipulation, including potential interference from external actors. Readers are encouraged to exercise critical judgment and corroborate the information provided.

Conclusion: The coups and revolutions examined in this report stand as testament to the enduring volatility of Russian politics. As Russia navigates its path forward, it must reckon with the legacies of its turbulent past and strive for stability amidst uncertainty.

Links:

• Alternative reddit: DOI - Lemmy
• InLEO - Real Alternative to Propaganda
• BASTYON - Blockchain-Based Social Network
• Join "War In Ukraine" Community
• Join "Team Ukraine" Community

Qoto Mastodon https://qoto.org/web/statuses/112190691002145462

Coups in Russian history represent important events that have a significant impact on the political and social life of the country. Here is a list of ten of the most violent coups in Russia since the reign of Ivan the Terrible:

1. The coups of the Time of Troubles (1598-1613): The Time of Troubles was a period of chaos and internal conflict that began after the death of the last of the Rurikovichs, Tsar Feodor Ioannovich. Several coups occurred during this time, including revolts by false Dmitrians, popular uprisings, and power struggles between different factions of the military aristocracy.
2. Revolution of 1905: This was the first large-scale armed mass protest against the tsarist regime and led to a widespread political crisis and bloody clashes with the authorities. Although the 1905 Revolution did not lead to the overthrow of tsarism, it was a precursor to the subsequent events of 1917.
3. February Revolution of 1917: This was a mass popular uprising that led to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a provisional government. The revolution began with mass strikes and demonstrations in Petrograd and was supported by the majority of the Russian population. However, the provisional government was eventually overthrown by the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution.
4. October Revolution of 1917: This was a coup organized by the Bolsheviks under the leadership of Lenin that overthrew the provisional government and established a socialist dictatorship in Russia. The October Revolution marked the beginning of the establishment of Soviet power and the Civil War.
5. Civil War in Russia (1917-1922): It was a conflict between the Bolshevik red army and the white armies of anti-Bolshevik forces. The war resulted in the deaths of millions of people and the destruction of the country and the establishment of Soviet power in Russia.
6. Stalin's Repression in the 1930s: Under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, a massive campaign was carried out in the USSR to exterminate political opponents, intellectuals, and other unsavory elements. The repressions resulted in millions of victims and dramatically changed the political environment of the country.
7. Kulak Uprising in 1932-1933: This was a peasant uprising in Ukraine that was suppressed by the Soviet government. As a result of the Holodomor and repression, millions of Ukrainians died from starvation and violence.
8. Gorbachev's Reforms and the Collapse of the USSR (1991): Under the leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev, the USSR underwent political and economic reforms that led to the collapse of the Soviet system and the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
9. First Chechen Conflict (1994-1996): This was a series of hostilities between the Russian armed forces and Chechen separatists that resulted in heavy casualties on both sides and catastrophic consequences for civilians.
10. Invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea (2014): This was Russia's military invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea, which led to conflict between Russia and the West and exacerbated tensions in the region. These coups and conflicts have had a huge impact on Russia's history and political development, leaving their imprint on the fate of millions of people and shaping the current geopolitical map of the region. *** Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***

https://zhub.link/@pytc/112190690938362873

Police in Peru have searched the home of the country's current leader, Dina Boluarte, as part of an investigation dubbed "Rolexgate".

The case came to light after journalists drew attention to a luxury watch worn by the politician at public events. A spokesman for the controlling agency said it would examine Boluarte's asset declarations for the past two years.