this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
403 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
57455 readers
4586 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not as bad as choosing not to use lidar for their automated driving, but pretty close.
Well, to remove LiDAR, as it was in place at first
That will never stop being hilarious to me lol
How Can Our Eyes Be Real And Cameras Not Be Sufficient For Autonomous Driving
It’s just… incredibly dumb. Because the problem is not the optics. The problem is making a control system that more or less replicates a “normal” human response pattern, but then got regulated and litigated to hell and back, plus some helpful navigation suggestions based on correlation of user location data to advertising partners in partner-defined geographic and social media and demographic targeting nets, plus the fucking legion of weird edge case bugs that have probably crept in at some point in the process.
At the same time, every once in a while, one should pause and consider how important it is to
But we don't need LIDAR! Humans don't have lidar, and they can drive! All you need to do is replicate millions of years of evolution in a few years and you're done!
Hahahaha!
Not as bad as making the cybertruck.
Selling. Companies make worthless concept designs all the time
TIL, what a joke. Based on a quick search it was merely cost cutting, they are idiots