this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
30 points (94.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55076 readers
437 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
30
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by WatTyler to c/[email protected]
 

Hi all,

Oftentimes, video files I download only include six-channel audio (i.e. 5.1). Using Tdarr, I transcode the video files and create a stereo audio channel from the surround channel.

At present, qBittorrent seems to seed these re-encoded files without complaint but if I force a recheck, it'll overwrite my newly-encoded files with the original. I'm concerned that my seeding these altered files is 'harming' the pool somehow but I am not sure?

An easy solution to this would be to keep two copies of each re-encoded file on my hard drive, so I watch the version with the stereo audio and seed the original. However, I do not have a lot of storage and would ideally minimize the copies I have of each file.

So, to sum-up, I suppose my question is: am I harming the torrent pool by seeding these altered versions? Or, if I want to be a responsible torrenter, do I need to keep duplicate versions, at least until my share ratio is 1:1?

Thanks.

EDIT:

Thank you to all those who took the time to comment and upvote. I've setup a 'pipeline' for seeding unaltered originals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I'm concerned that my seeding these altered files is 'harming' the pool somehow

It 100% is. STOP DOING THIS. You are NOT seeding the original files. You are 100% poisoning the swarm. You WILL get banned, and it will be your own fault.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Wouldn't the checksums break the torrent anyway and attempt to fix by redownloading

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

If someone inadvertently did this because they recently started transcoding their media library (...that would be me...), and didn't think about the seeding torrents, can you do anything to mitigate such bans?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

transcode to a copy of that file
treat active torrented files as "do not edit"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes that's what I'm supposed to do from now on...I'm asking what I can do so I'm "un"-blacklisted/banned, if that has happened because of my previous mistake.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nothing. It’s an automated. Just stop doing it and it’ll decay with time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Excellent, thanks

[–] WatTyler 6 points 7 months ago

I'm delighted to hear that I'm not alone 😅

[–] WatTyler 8 points 7 months ago

My apologies. I can't say I've done this a lot, as I've always been concerned this was the case. I've made the necessary adjustments.