this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
87 points (98.9% liked)

Legal News

177 readers
17 users here now

International and local legal news.

Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

In the October incident, a pedestrian crossing the road was struck by another vehicle before landing in front of the Cruise taxi. The robotaxi braked hard but ran over the person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I get what you’re saying and part of me agrees; we all want to see fewer injuries from automobiles and I hope the self-driving tech can get us there.

Another part of me is livid that any of us deem any amount of harm or death from automobiles as being “within acceptable limits”, especially when it’s used to justify the current problems, injuries, and deaths from self-driving tech.

Car companies could be making automobiles [for the US market] much safer for everyone but they refuse to do so. They could:

— Make smaller vehicles

— Make vehicles lighter in weight

— Stop making oversized trucks and SUVs

— Lower the front bumper height and hood height of trucks and SUVs so that pedestrians who are struck are thrown onto or away from the vehicle instead of being smashed into a 6-foot tall grille and then run over.

— Limit the max speed of the vehicles

— Cease putting touch screens in vehicles and go back to physical and tactile knobs, buttons, and switches.

Government policies and regulation could be addressing all this and more as well. Again, they refuse to do so.