130

Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men (www.researchgate.net)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Why would someone know your gender, out your identity?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I figured it would look more professional, and it would also let me separate the contributions I made with my more anonymous GitHub out—not too sure how closely they investigate your previous contributions and how good your code was.

I am guessing this was not a good choice, and I should have just continued using my more anonymous GitHub, or made the account as JSmith instead of JaneSmith.

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024

130 points (98.5% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17548 readers

16 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]