this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
51 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
8189 readers
441 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The US van manufacture more ATACMS, Russia likely can't make more S300/400s due to sanctions.
Yeah the tactical & strategic importance is even better, woot woot!
Ehhhh. I was looking at this the other day.
We ended production back in....2006, I think?
checks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS
That was almost twenty years back. You can eventually restart, but once you shut down production, the equipment goes away, the people go do other things, some retire, etc. You can't just switch production back on easily.
It does reference in 2023, serious consideration of restarting production, but I don't know what the time window on that would have been:
My understanding is that PrSM will more-or-less fill the role that ATACMS had, and we've just started rolling those out in the past few months. I'd guess that unless PrSM wasn't accepted, we'd probably rather produce the newer missile then recreate production of an older one.
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-army-gets-hands-new-missile-replacing-powerful-atacms-2023-12
Russia, on the other hand, does have the S-400 in production. Dunno about the S-300s.
kagis
Yeah, looks like all of S-300s, S-400s, and S-500s are in concurrent production.
Sanctions probably don't help, though I don't know what the impact is on any specific item.
That being said, I think that there's a different reason for this to be an issue for Russia: stockpile size.
https://www.axios.com/2024/04/24/us-long-range-missiles-atacms-ukraine-war
https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2024/01/21/russia-lost-15-batteries-of-the-prized-s-400-missile-system-since-the-beginning-of-the-war-worth-20-5-billion/
Russia's probably going to run out long before in an attrition game, if Ukraine can get access to all of them.
I also understand that ATACMS has a role in US strategy with China, so I don't think that Ukraine is going to get all of them. But I expect that they can get enough.
This guy on YouTube has had a few videos talking about ATACMS, and notably I recall him predicting Ukraine hitting the helicopter base that they hit with cluster ATACMS prior to them actually doing so.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ikgDkf4ATEo
He made the same point, and mentioned that the command vehicle and radar, rather than the launchers, are probably the limiting factors.
Oh wow I hadn't realized those were so old, and that they barely had their next gen replacements in production.
That doesn't seem like a lot of them should a full scale war hit the US.
I don't know that much about their originally-intended role, but my guess is that they probably would have been okay.
Ukraine's having to lean heavily on artillery, including both tube and rocket artillery, because they don't have a huge air force. The US has an overwhelming amount of air power. I don't know about hypothetical peer- and near-peer conflicts, but if you look at past US conflicts, the US tends to favor a pattern that looks something like this:
Destroy air defenses.
Strike targets that can be identified up with air power.
Send troops in carefully to take ground, relying upon air support.
The problem is that Ukraine's missing that air power element, so they're relying on using classes of weapons that were intended to play a smaller role for the US. Ukraine managed to burn through the 155mm artillery shells that the US could spare because the US did not expect to have the kind of level of reliance on tube artillery that Ukraine does.
The last really major US operation against intact air defenses was probably Desert Storm. The Operations Room has a pretty good YouTube video that highlights the opening of the conflict, which was almost entirely handled from the air.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxRgfBXn6Mg
Surface-to-surface missiles -- Tomahawks -- did play a role there in targeting air defenses, but they weren't the primary tool being used. The US also had stealthy aircraft (F-117s) that penetrated air defenses, aircraft launching weapons from standoff range (B-52s) firing ALCMs from standoff range, where SAMs couldn't hit them, a lot of jamming and decoy capacity helping Wild Weasel aircraft to fly in and hit air defenses with anti-radiation missiles (though to be fair, Ukraine has some of these too), and so forth.
Very interesting. Appreciate the effort that went into both of these replies. Thanks!