this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
1046 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

9984 readers
1730 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1046
Name & shame. :) (mander.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But the publisher who published it should be liable too. Wtf is their job then? Parasiting off of public funded research?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bitfucker knew that was rhetorical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How was that obvious?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I can't tell if this question is rhetorical.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Research journals are often rated for the quality of the content they publish. My guess is that this "journal" is just shit. If you're a student or researcher, you will come across shit like this and you should be smart enough to tell when something is poor quality.