this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
133 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38237 readers
2667 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15826549

Ruling Conservative Party says it will bring back national service if it wins the July 4 general election.

Eighteen-year-olds will have to perform a mandatory national service if the Conservative Party is voted back to power in the United Kingdom’s July 4 election, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has announced.

The prime minister’s plan would entail young people being given a choice between a full-time placement in the armed forces for 12 months or spending one weekend a month for a year volunteering in their community, the party said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Maybe I’m missing something. In fact I’m sure I am as I don’t follow UK politics closely at all. Mostly what I know is from scrolling past headlines like this one.

Confusing thing #1: My understanding is the Conservative (Tory?) party is struggling so the PM called for a “snap” election.

If you’re not doing great, wouldn’t it make more sense to try and weather the storm and work to make things sunnier before the next election rather than call for an election amidst the storm?

Confusing thing #2: If you are in said storm and now looking down the barrel of an election, wouldn’t that be the opposite of the time you would want to announce your unpopular policy ideas?

This really sounds like someone who is trying to get fired instead of quit.

So what am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’re missing that they are just incompetent and awful at politics

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But haven’t they been in power for like 10 years or something?

That may be more of a condemnation of their opposition than of them…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It partly is but also that they’ve just ran out of “talent”. Anyone who was any good was there at the start and they’ve just not been able to replace them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

More like actively removed them for yes men at the last election because the competent ones opposed brexit. The current administration is more a populist brexit party than a traditions Conservative platform.

load more comments (14 replies)