this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7080 readers
532 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pride groups and some health-care providers are harshly criticizing the Alberta government's latest attempt to get feedback on its proposed gender identity policies β€” a private invite that requires participants to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

"If [Premier Danielle Smith] really wants to hear what we have to say, she can schedule a public hearing where those of us who are part of the medical community can be on record to say what we think about this," said Dr. Jake Donaldson, a Calgary family physician who provides gender-affirming health care.

"I understand there are people who feel strongly about this and people who may not feel safe being vocal about these issues ... but at the end of the day, this needs to be a public conversation."

In an email obtained by CBC News, the provincial government invited 40 organizations and individuals to participate in virtual focus group sessions about its proposed policies. The new rules would affect student gender identity, youth gender-affirming surgeries and health care, and trans women's participation in sports.

The email is signed by a senior policy adviser for Alberta Health. It notes that if invitees want to participate, they must sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its infuriating how much time and money they are spending to oppress less than 1% of the population!!!

For a group that keeps screetching about freedom they sure do hate it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Whenever a conservative group attacks LGBTQ+ people - it's always a distraction and/or low-risk, low-effort way of gaining support. They can attack less than 1% of the population and rile up support from their hardcore base at the same time. It also takes scrutinsing eyes off any other ongoing scandals or misdeeds the government is doing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

What's more infuriating is that we have federal protections for gender identity already in place, so these policies could be subject to discrimination lawsuits from trans people, costing even more taxpayer money.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think it's fairly obvious that there's some sort of disparate impact on trans people happening here. It's also a form of sex discrimination, but I'm not sure how far that argument would go in court.