this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
973 points (100.0% liked)

196

16216 readers
2215 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you limit the resolution of the gayness measurement, sure. You could define least gay as 0 and most gay as 5, then you have millions of people on 5. But there are infinitely many real numbers, and if there were some theoretical 100% accurate way to measure "gayness" (whatever that means) at "infinite resolution", the chance of two people being equally most gay is theoretically 0. On the other hand of the spectrum, it'd be impossible to be ENTIRELY not gay at all, so even if millions of people are very close to 0, one would be the closest.

I'm way overthinking this lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean it has to be a limit, a person can only be so gay. Like even if we define a spectrum as far and wide as we like. Let's say height for example. That's an infinite scale, but a human will never be a light year in height, it's just not physically possible. And once there's one human to reach the highest physical limit, what's stopping someone else from also reaching that point?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

a person can only be so gay

I knew a lesbian couple but one is now a trans man who transitioned a few years after they married eachother. I like to joke that they are so gay they went all the way around to being straight again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But we know the tallest person in the world and possibly the tallest person in history. I’m sure if we can calculate a gayness metric we can also find these values, at the very least once our metric is define.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just because we recorded one tallest man, doesn't mean there was never and won't ever be one that's just as tall. Like sure, depending on our exact metric of gayness, there may very well only be one gayest person, but there could also be a 100, a 1000 or even more gayest people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we should have a competition then? Like an annual Gayman competition where gayletes can compete in various gay events, with a winner eventually crowned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Competitive gay! The ultimate gay-off!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The probability of someone reaching that physical limit is 0.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but the probability of multiple people reaching the highest point a person will ever reach is not 0.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

No that probability is 0 as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not only that. What if there are multiple aspects to what gay defines. Is it just how much they like the same sex, or also how many fake stories they post online? One can score a 5 on one, and a 4 on the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

The spectrum being multidimensional doesn't stop us from maxing out every metric of what's physically possible.